> Formulas would not be the best approach. See Debra's reply.
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> >> >
> >> > Any suggestions?
Ok, if your data is sorted by the dept code you can try this and see if the
performance is acceptable.
THE DATA MUST BE SORTED BY THE DEPT CODE OR THIS WON'T WORK!
Here's a small sample file:
Filter.xls 26.5kb
http://cjoint.com/?kzekHu6Yq6
The sample file uses a much smaller data table than you describe, 20 rows by
5 columns, but you'll see the formula needed.
**The formula on Sheet2 B2 has been copied across to 5 columns then down to
enough rows that it covers the maximum expected number of matches. For
example, you say:
>the most any one department would have on their inventory is probably
>200 items with most of the departments only having less than 75.
So that means you would have to copy the formula to AT LEAST 200 rows.
For those who might be following this thread but don't want to/can't
download the sample file:
Data table on Sheet1 in the range A2:F20. The SORTED code numbers in column
A. The sort can be either ascending or descending, it doesn't matter.
Sheet2 A2 = user input of code number to filter.
Formula entered in Sheet2 B2:
=IF(ROWS(Sheet1!$1:1)<=COUNTIF(Sheet1!$A$2:$A$20,$A$2),INDEX(Sheet1!$B$2:$F$20,MATCH($A$2,Sheet1!$A$2:$A$20,0)+ROWS($1:1)-1,COLUMNS($A:A)),"")
Copied across then down (see ** above).
Biff
> If it makes any difference, the most any one department would have on
> their
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>> >> >
>> >> > Any suggestions?