>also Ron's and Nanavati work, but not the other one.
Hi Biff
You did preface your formula, with
>Assuming there are no negative numbers in the range
in which case it would be absolutely fine
I think Shane was referring to the fact that the OP said
>average the dollars over the months that have a dollar amount greater
>than zero?
I think that all other posters have implied from this that there may be
negative numbers, but I agree that may not be what the OP was saying.
I guess using SUMIF(B1:B20,">0") covers both scenarios.

Signature
Regards
Roger Govier
> >also Ron's and Nanavati work, but not the other one.
>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>>> >
>>> > Chazbri
ShaneDevenshire - 16 Jun 2007 23:49 GMT
Yes Roger,
This is really a question of how we read the question and I assumed that >0
did not imply that all numbers were positive in the original data set. And I
did notice the preface but I assumed that a different question was being
asked. As we all know we are up against the wall to guess what questions
often mean. Hopefully users can work out what it is they are asking and
therefore which solutions meet their needs. Nothing wrong with SUM(...)/ if
there are no negative values.

Signature
Cheers,
Shane Devenshire
> Hi Biff
>
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
> >>> >
> >>> > Chazbri