It's called basic arithmetic. If I want to have 3% more of something, I
need to have the whole somehthing, 1, and the 3% more, thus 1 plus 3%, that
is to say 1.03.
Did you go to school?
Tyro
> THANK YOU VERY MUCH -- IT WORKED!!!
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>> =(1+.03)*D22
Matt Richardson - 13 Feb 2008 10:00 GMT
> It's called basic arithmetic. If I want to have 3% more of something, I
> need to have the whole somehthing, 1, and the 3% more, thus 1 plus 3%, that
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> >> --
> >> Gary''s Student - gsnu200768
Tyro, I don't see the need to patronise others because they don't
understand something. We're supposed to be here to help, not to
criticise people because they might not be as clever.
Sorry to have a go but I don't think its fair.
Regards,
Matt Richardson
http://teachr.blogspot.com
bronxbabe - 13 Feb 2008 16:53 GMT
nice jab, Matt ;)
11:50EST
> > It's called basic arithmetic. If I want to have 3% more of something, I
> > need to have the whole somehthing, 1, and the 3% more, thus 1 plus 3%, that
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Matt Richardson
> http://teachr.blogspot.com
Meenie - 13 Feb 2008 14:29 GMT
Wow, that's the first flame I ever saw here! :)
> It's called basic arithmetic. If I want to have 3% more of something, I
> need to have the whole somehthing, 1, and the 3% more, thus 1 plus 3%, that
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> >
> >> =(1+.03)*D22
Meenie - 13 Feb 2008 14:40 GMT
Actually, I don't get using the 1 either. I would have done =(d22*.03)+a2
It comes out the same (I do see the other works also but it seems a bit
'round the elbow). You get the same answer with either, but one seems to use
logic that is more easily followed.
> It's called basic arithmetic. If I want to have 3% more of something, I
> need to have the whole somehthing, 1, and the 3% more, thus 1 plus 3%, that
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> >
> >> =(1+.03)*D22
bronxbabe - 13 Feb 2008 16:27 GMT
that's ok. i DID go to school and i'm smart enough to ignore a..holes like
tyro.
but, ... i figured it out. the "1" in the formula =(1+0.3)*D22 indicates
the first cell to the left.
can u explain that, TYRO???
HA!
11:25EST
> Actually, I don't get using the 1 either. I would have done =(d22*.03)+a2
> It comes out the same (I do see the other works also but it seems a bit
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> > >
> > >> =(1+.03)*D22
bronxbabe - 13 Feb 2008 16:35 GMT
i just created that bs because it sounds good, but the reply to Tyro stands!
Meenie's formula is much easier for a novice to understand!
11:29EST
> that's ok. i DID go to school and i'm smart enough to ignore a..holes like
> tyro.
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> > > >
> > > >> =(1+.03)*D22
David Biddulph - 13 Feb 2008 18:22 GMT
I'm delighted that your novice understands where the value in A2 in Meenie's
formula comes from, and how that value relates to the value in D22. :-)

Signature
David Biddulph
>i just created that bs because it sounds good, but the reply to Tyro
>stands!
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>> > > >
>> > > >> =(1+.03)*D22
Meenie - 13 Feb 2008 19:55 GMT
hehe, thanks David... you were too fast, I posted a correction - we must
have been typing at the same time! :D I did it in my excel and used a2
instead of d22
I think it was a nice example of "seeing what one knew should be there" lol
> I'm delighted that your novice understands where the value in A2 in Meenie's
> formula comes from, and how that value relates to the value in D22. :-)
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> =(1+.03)*D22
Meenie - 13 Feb 2008 18:36 GMT
Oops my formula should have read: =(d22*.03)+d22
NOT =(d22*.03)+A2
I worked it in my excel and used A2 instead of D22 LOL
Meenie - 13 Feb 2008 18:33 GMT
Oh well, if it makes him feel better about himself to put others down, who
are we to take away his security blanket? :)
> that's ok. i DID go to school and i'm smart enough to ignore a..holes like
> tyro.
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> > > >
> > > >> =(1+.03)*D22
bronxbabe - 13 Feb 2008 16:49 GMT
actually Meenie i don't think your formula would work. i'm calculating state
tollroad revenues and each cell (year) increases 3% more than the previous --
"D" being the first cell (year).
thanks,
11:43EST
> Actually, I don't get using the 1 either. I would have done =(d22*.03)+a2
> It comes out the same (I do see the other works also but it seems a bit
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> > >
> > >> =(1+.03)*D22
Meenie - 13 Feb 2008 18:31 GMT
So the .03% is always of the previous cell? ie: the first cell was 88, the
next was .03% of 88 added to 88 - =(d22*.03)+d22? So if you use the fill
function to drag the formula over to the next cell, the formula will increase
with you ie: drag d23 to d24 and the formula will change to =(d23+.03)+d23
and so on.
I did it and it appears to work (I started in a1) :
88 90.64 93.36 96.16 99.04 102.02 105.08
It seems to work in my graph (and on my calculator too) :)
> actually Meenie i don't think your formula would work. i'm calculating state
> tollroad revenues and each cell (year) increases 3% more than the previous --
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> > > >
> > > >> =(1+.03)*D22
Pete_UK - 13 Feb 2008 19:13 GMT
Meenie,
just a small point - if you copy across then it is the letter
reference that will change, so
=(D22*0.03)+D22 (another typing mistake)
will become:
=(E22*0.03)+E22
and
=(F22*0.03)+F22
and so on.
Pete
> So the .03% is always of the previous cell? ie: the first cell was 88, the
> next was .03% of 88 added to 88 - =(d22*.03)+d22? So if you use the fill
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Meenie - 13 Feb 2008 19:53 GMT
Thanks Pete, my fingers are out of sync with my eyes today :)
Anyway, drag it across and it appears to work. :)
> Meenie,
>
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
> >
> > - Show quoted text -