Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Excel / New Users / September 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Maximum number of rows in a excel 2003 work sheet

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Glinty - 04 Sep 2007 17:32 GMT
Hi,
As a new user to excel I am thinking of setting up a data base of my music.
The total number of tracks is in excess of 70,000. I have seen a simple
solution using excel which would be ok but I'm not sure if I can have 70,000
rows in one work sheet. A friend has suggested access which I am not
familiar with and don't know if this will allow 70,000 entries. Can anyone
please tell me what the maximum numbers are in both access and excel 2003.

Cheers
Glinty
Peo Sjoblom - 04 Sep 2007 17:40 GMT
Max in Excel 2003 is 65536 (in one sheet) whereas Access only limit is your
memory

Signature

Regards,

Peo Sjoblom

> Hi,
> As a new user to excel I am thinking of setting up a data base of my
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Cheers
> Glinty
Glinty - 04 Sep 2007 18:18 GMT
Thanks Peo, It looks like I'm going to have to start learning about Access
then.
Cheers
Glinty
> Max in Excel 2003 is 65536 (in one sheet) whereas Access only limit is
> your memory
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>> Cheers
>> Glinty
Peo Sjoblom - 04 Sep 2007 18:33 GMT
Excel 2007 has over a million rows, of course it has a new radical design
hated by a lot of people and loved by a few

Signature

Regards,

Peo Sjoblom

> Thanks Peo, It looks like I'm going to have to start learning about Access
> then.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>>> Cheers
>>> Glinty
Gordon - 04 Sep 2007 19:43 GMT
> Excel 2007 has over a million rows, of course it has a new radical design
> hated by a lot of people and loved by a few

And in any case, Excel is a data MANIPULATION application, not a database.
Anything with data approaching 60,000 records will be MUCH better served
using a specific database application rather than Excel...
Peo Sjoblom - 04 Sep 2007 20:51 GMT
I agree, use a database for storing lots of records, then use Excel to query
the database whether it is using a database query or a pivot table..
Unfortunately many people use it as a database then complain when it is
slow.

Signature

Regards,

Peo Sjoblom

>> Excel 2007 has over a million rows, of course it has a new radical design
>> hated by a lot of people and loved by a few
>
> And in any case, Excel is a data MANIPULATION application, not a database.
> Anything with data approaching 60,000 records will be MUCH better served
> using a specific database application rather than Excel...
JMB - 05 Sep 2007 04:40 GMT
> Unfortunately many people use it as a database then complain when it is
> slow.

I imagine that abuse was further encouraged when they added over 1 million
rows.

> I agree, use a database for storing lots of records, then use Excel to query
> the database whether it is using a database query or a pivot table..
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> > Anything with data approaching 60,000 records will be MUCH better served
> > using a specific database application rather than Excel...
Gordon - 05 Sep 2007 07:58 GMT
>> Unfortunately many people use it as a database then complain when it is
>> slow.
>
> I imagine that abuse was further encouraged when they added over 1 million
> rows.

Yes - I cannot IMAGINE any sane person using Excel with that amount of
data - and I'm a retired (just!) Systems and Management Accountant...
gls858 - 05 Sep 2007 17:24 GMT
>>> Unfortunately many people use it as a database then complain when it is
>>> slow.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Yes - I cannot IMAGINE any sane person using Excel with that amount of
> data - and I'm a retired (just!) Systems and Management Accountant...

I agree but 65000 rows was a limit that I bumped against constantly.
I work with a database with about 75000 SKU's and customer sales history
that commonly exceeded the row limit. I was glad to see the increase.
While most of what I needed could be done in Access sometimes it's just
easier for me to do it in Excel.

gls858
Gord Dibben - 04 Sep 2007 20:55 GMT
> loved by a few

Can you name any of these few>g>

Gord
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.