> .. what happens if we want to add another 2 columns to filter
Just extend the criteria in the helper col to suit
Eg if you have 5 cols to check, cols A to E
Put this in say, F2:
=IF(COUNTA(A2:E2)<5,"",SUMPRODUCT((A$2:A2=A2)*(B$2:B2=B2)*(C$2:C2=C2)*(D$2:D2=D2)*(E$2:E2=E2))>1)
Copy down, rest of steps similar
> Also sometimes filter by 3 columns sometime by 5
You can always do up the criteria check on 3 cols in one helper col, and
frame up the 5 cols check in another helper col. Then filter separately, etc
>> we realized also that the true after the false that we need because all
>> of
>> them are only when there is a difference in the cells then the last row
>> before the change gets the false but the change has a true like all
>> mojaroty
I'm clueless. Suggest you put this in as a fresh new posting.

Signature
Max
Singapore
http://savefile.com/projects/236895
xdemechanik
---
dk - 26 Mar 2008 03:59 GMT
whats with the problem of true & false the last one before the change gets a
false all others get true we nedd to copy the true after the false
> > .. what happens if we want to add another 2 columns to filter
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> I'm clueless. Suggest you put this in as a fresh new posting.
Max - 26 Mar 2008 05:38 GMT
I'm still clueless. Suggest you put this scenario in as a **fresh new**
posting.

Signature
Max
Singapore
http://savefile.com/projects/236895
xdemechanik
---
> whats with the problem of true & false the last one before the change gets
> a
> false all others get true we nedd to copy the true after the false
dk - 27 Mar 2008 17:18 GMT
we have put in new post already 1 day as autofilter special but no replies so
maybe original idea is accurate because the change of true & false isn't in
the righ row it's 1 row ahead?
> I'm still clueless. Suggest you put this scenario in as a **fresh new**
> posting.
> > whats with the problem of true & false the last one before the change gets
> > a
> > false all others get true we nedd to copy the true after the false
Max - 27 Mar 2008 21:32 GMT
Maybe it's because your problem description is so terse & vague that nobody
can quite understand what you're talking about. Suggest you elaborate and
illustrate your scenario fully, post the expression that you're using, etc.
Of course you need to be certain yourself what exactly is it that you want
to do. If you yourself are not clear what you want, how do you expect others
to be able to respond?

Signature
Max
Singapore
http://savefile.com/projects/236895
xdemechanik
---
> we have put in new post already 1 day as autofilter special but no replies
> so
> maybe original idea is accurate because the change of true & false isn't
> in
> the righ row it's 1 row ahead?
dk - 28 Mar 2008 00:47 GMT
thanks for relying
We copied your code & we are attaching a file with results
EGmr 01-DafHaY R Moshe M Weiss TRUE
EGmr 01-DafHaY R Moshe M Weiss TRUE
EGmr 01-DafHaY R Moshe M Weiss TRUE
EGmr 01-DafHaY R Moshe M Weiss TRUE
EGmr 01-DafHaY R Moshe M Weiss FALSE
EGmr 01-DafHaY R Moshe Gold TRUE
look were the false & true comes up when we filter we need the new name row
not all the true's only the first true after false
> Maybe it's because your problem description is so terse & vague that nobody
> can quite understand what you're talking about. Suggest you elaborate and
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> > in
> > the righ row it's 1 row ahead?
Max - 28 Mar 2008 08:41 GMT
See response in your new post.

Signature
Max
Singapore
http://savefile.com/projects/236895
xdemechanik
---