Hi all. I have a workbook with multiple worksheets. I have hyperlinks between
the first worksheet and others in the book, just using the cell reference (eg
E4). The problem I have is when I add a row, the links are messed up.
I tried naming the cells I'm linking to, but then the links didn't work at
all.
Any ideas?

Signature
Thanks! Chatnoir
Gary''s Student - 04 Apr 2007 01:10 GMT
A formula like:
=HYPERLINK("#Sheet2!I14","go")
will lock to the absolute address. So if you add rows before row 4, it will
always go to the fourth row. However:
The following uses the HYPERLINK() function to goto Sheet3 cell Z100:
=HYPERLINK("#"&CELL("address",Sheet3!Z100),"target")
This link will "adjust". So if you add or remove rows above Z100, the
formula will adjust!

Signature
Gary''s Student - gsnu200713
Chatnoir - 04 Apr 2007 01:22 GMT
I understand that #Sheet2 is the worksheet name, but in teh next example what
do #"&CELL mean?
(I'll try the first one now.. since I kinda get it. :-}

Signature
Thanks! Chatnoir
> A formula like:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> This link will "adjust". So if you add or remove rows above Z100, the
> formula will adjust!
Dave Peterson - 04 Apr 2007 01:20 GMT
If you used insert|Hyperlink, then you should try using the named range again.
It should work ok.
> Hi all. I have a workbook with multiple worksheets. I have hyperlinks between
> the first worksheet and others in the book, just using the cell reference (eg
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> --
> Thanks! Chatnoir

Signature
Dave Peterson
Chatnoir - 04 Apr 2007 01:30 GMT
Gary's 2nd method worked for me. Thanks! I'll try Dave's too - it looks a
little easier.Appreciate the great help.

Signature
Thanks! Chatnoir
> If you used insert|Hyperlink, then you should try using the named range again.
> It should work ok.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> > --
> > Thanks! Chatnoir
Dave Peterson - 04 Apr 2007 02:28 GMT
Actually, if I were doing this with lots and lots of hyperlinks, I'd use Gary's
second suggestion, too.
I think the =hyperlink() worksheet function is better behaved.
> Gary's 2nd method worked for me. Thanks! I'll try Dave's too - it looks a
> little easier.Appreciate the great help.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> >
> > Dave Peterson

Signature
Dave Peterson