
Signature
---
HTH
Bob
(change the xxxx to gmail if mailing direct)
Thanks for your response, but I oversimplified. It happens I guess.
:-)
The Mod formula I put is a derived result from the value in the cell.
The cell itself generally contains 0-9/A-Z which has to get validated
against the rest of the cells in that row to determine if it needs to
be changed. The result is I end up with the original set of values and
a derived set of values (which essentially could be reduced to a
TRUE/FALSE list) for the row, and it's this derived set which I'm using
to determine colouring.
I did have formulas to do this, but it reached the point where they
were too time consuming -- 1/4+ seconds per cell... not bad if you're
not doing it too often, but dealing with changing fifty thousand or
more cells over a session, it was considerable -- and there were a
couple other issues, like file size that came into play.
The cell by cell stuff i'm currently doing is considerably faster than
that, but I was hoping there was a way to do it faster yet. Comparing
the performance of obtaining the data, doing the manipulations to
determine the status, and outputting the results -- the output is by
far the most time consuming.
I had also considered (although it isn't really what I want to do, and
probably doesn't help for putting the validation in the same cells)
adding a helper column for each cell. Then, I could just dump 1/0 in
the cell, and use that for conditional formatting. But, that doesn't
fix the validation side of things, I don't think. (That said, I
haven't compared the relative speed of updating colour to that of
updating validation.)
Sorry, I am rather long winded.
Scott
> I would use CF for that first colouring like so
>
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
> > Thanks,
> > Scott