>Bob: First, If I reply to the originator then the replier doesn't see the
>response. I think all the responders should see all the responses.
Why is that?
I've never found that to be a problem. Maybe you need a proper newsreader?
--ron
Joel,
I have no problem with you joining in if you think you have something to
add, but the guy mentioned an array defined in VB, so it seemed reasonable
to me that he knew what an array is. Notwithstanding that issue, and the
point that you make there may be valid, but perhaps you could take note of
someone like Dave Peterson who, when he jumps in, tends to make the
additional point, and explain that he is making an additional point and what
he thinks is not previously fully explained, rather than just seemingly
repeating the previous post, albeit in more words.
But on the other point, why would the replier not see the response. The
whole thread is there to be read. If I see a response below mine, I tend to
think it pertains to my response and I read it, which means that I waste my
time. And you are the only regular that I know that does that, no-one else
seems to think it valid.

Signature
---
HTH
Bob
(there's no email, no snail mail, but somewhere should be gmail in my addy)
> Bob: First, If I reply to the originator then the replier doesn't see the
> response. I think all the responders should see all the responses.
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
>> >> > this
>> >> > function? Thanks.
SteveM - 09 Dec 2007 15:49 GMT
> Joel,
>
[quoted text clipped - 93 lines]
> >> >> > this
> >> >> > function? Thanks.
Bob, Suggest you ignore any responses submitted by Joel to minimize
time wasted.
Joel, Suggest you consider the rationale of Bob's position, but also
ignore his posts if it suits you.
If that doesn't work, I suggest Marquis of Queensbury Rules and 8
ounce gloves.
SteveM