Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Excel / Programming / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

How can I install Excel 95 on a new Windows Vista machine  ?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
charles.jordan@btopenworld.com - 22 Mar 2008 18:28 GMT
For historical and educational reasons, I want to install Excel 95 on
a brand new HP PC, which comes shipped wth Vista.

Can I install Windows XP somewhere on it (which does support Excel 95
(ie Version 7) )  ?  If ncessary, partition it and install Windows XP
first ? Will this degrade system performance ?

The outcome of this ambition matters very greatly to me..

Thanks all _

Charles
Howard Kaikow - 22 Mar 2008 19:13 GMT
> For historical and educational reasons, I want to install Excel 95 on
> a brand new HP PC, which comes shipped wth Vista.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> The outcome of this ambition matters very greatly to me..

First, you need to set up your computer so you can boot to either Vista or,
an earlier OS, such as Windows XP.

Usually, you should install the older OS first.
Each OS must be in a separate partition.

Having multiple OS does not affect performance.
When you  are booted to one OS, the other OS is not running.

If  Excel 95 can run in Windows XP, then just boot to XP and install Office
95.
Has no effect on what goes on when you are booted into Vista.
charles.jordan@btopenworld.com - 22 Mar 2008 20:02 GMT
> <charles.jor...@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> 95.
> Has no effect on what goes on when you are booted into Vista.

Thanks Howard . I think however Rick Rothstein, below, has "an inside
track"  !

Thanks - Charles
Gord Dibben - 22 Mar 2008 20:22 GMT
See one reply at your other posting over in the public.excel newsgroup

Multi-posting just tends to fragment replies and waste time and effort with
duplicate responses from multi-responders.

Gord Dibben  MS Excel MVP

>> <charles.jor...@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
>>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
>Thanks - Charles
Howard Kaikow - 23 Mar 2008 15:53 GMT
Thanks Howard . I think however Rick Rothstein, below, has "an inside
track"  !

My train will not run on Rick's track.

I will not use a virtual OS, as I want to assure that there are no
unexpected impacts on software that I run.
This can be assured only by directly running in an OS, with no extra layers
of software.
JLGWhiz - 22 Mar 2008 19:16 GMT
Check out this site.

http://www.computerhope.com/dwin.htm

> For historical and educational reasons, I want to install Excel 95 on
> a brand new HP PC, which comes shipped wth Vista.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Charles
charles.jordan@btopenworld.com - 22 Mar 2008 20:00 GMT
> Check out this site.
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Thanks, JLG Whiz - great stuff.
Charles
Rick Rothstein (MVP - VB) - 22 Mar 2008 19:32 GMT
If your system has the resources for it, you might find this an interesting
alternative to partitioning your drives...

http://www.microsoft.com/windows/downloads/virtualpc/default.mspx

I have it set up on my 64-bit Vista laptop (don't ask<g>) and what it does
is let me run Windows XP inside a window on my Vista computer. That means I
can switch between Windows Vista programs and Windows XP programs as easily
a I can switch between any two running applications. It really is quite
neat! And best of all, the program is free (of course, you need a legitimate
copy of Windows XP to install into it, but I assume from your question that
you already have it).

Rick

> For historical and educational reasons, I want to install Excel 95 on
> a brand new HP PC, which comes shipped wth Vista.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Charles
charles.jordan@btopenworld.com - 22 Mar 2008 19:58 GMT
On 22 Mar, 18:32, "Rick Rothstein \(MVP - VB\)"
<rick.newsNO.S...@NO.SPAMverizon.net> wrote:
> If your system has the resources for it, you might find this an interesting
> alternative to partitioning your drives...
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Rick - this looks aboslutely brilliant ! The neatest solution
imaginable, anot very well publicised yet ?

MANY thanks - Charles
Peter T - 22 Mar 2008 20:38 GMT
One more -

Have you actually tried to install your Excel 95 on Vista. If not why not
give it a go, ignore all warnings. FWIW, although I haven't installed XL'95
I have installed one or two other very old both W3.1 & W95 app's in Vista,
no problems despite the warnings.

One thing though, before attempting to do that, fully uninstall any other
versions of Excel as they should always be installed in order of oldest
first. Also don't install into a default "Office" folder but say into
"Office95"

Regards,
Peter T

> For historical and educational reasons, I want to install Excel 95 on
> a brand new HP PC, which comes shipped wth Vista.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Charles
Nils Titley - 23 Mar 2008 18:00 GMT
Vitural PC is the best solution.  you can have as many operating system
running as you want as long as you have enough space on your hard drive.

> For historical and educational reasons, I want to install Excel 95 on
> a brand new HP PC, which comes shipped wth Vista.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Charles
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.