"Rick Rothstein \(MVP - VB\)" wrote...
>>>=SUMIF(A:A,"<="&TODAY(),B:B)
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> dates were in dd/mm/yyyy format, then figure out for yourself why YOUR
> question is foolish?
My point was that Bob used a condition of less than or equal to TODAY and
the user specified the dates were dates for payments that have already been
made... which of those dates could ever have a date **after** today's date
then (an already made payment can't take place in the future, right)? Since
**every** date in the column must be on or before today's date, a condition
of "less than or equal to" equates to just a pure summation of **all** of
the values for all of the dates, does it not?
Rick
Pete_UK - 07 Jun 2007 09:37 GMT
In the example that the OP submitted, he has (nominal?) payments down
against future dates in his list - presumably these are changed to
actual payments once made. That's how I interpreted the request in my
response to a duplicate posting of his, although I suggested just less
than TODAY(), rather than less than or equal to. I assumed he wanted
actual payments made, rather than projected payments.
Pete
On Jun 7, 8:55 am, "Rick Rothstein \(MVP - VB\)"
<rickNOSPAMn...@NOSPAMcomcast.net> wrote:
> >>>=SUMIF(A:A,"<="&TODAY(),B:B)
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Rick
Harlan Grove - 07 Jun 2007 09:43 GMT
"Rick Rothstein \(MVP - VB\)" wrote...
...
>My point was that Bob used a condition of less than or equal to
>TODAY and the user specified the dates were dates for payments
>that have already been made...
Wrong! The OP actually wrote: "...payments made to date". The sample
schedule of payments obviously spans the first 10 months of 2007. At
least that's obvious to most people with some experience responding in
Excel newsgroups.
Bob's answer is correct. You're either incapable or unwilling to
recognize why it's correct and not silly.
> . . . which of those dates could ever have a date **after**
>today's date . . .
OK, so you have no experience with or understanding of amortization
tables, financial pro formas, etc. which show future anticipated
cashflows and could also show actual past cashflows as well.