I was able to reduce the size of the Returned Data Set from the view and
performance is acceptable now...but WATCH OUT....large data sets will cripple
a DDLB!
> I have noticed some VERY slow performance...nearly unacceptably so...when
> dealing with a DDLB that gets its data from a secondary data source...in this
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> only contains ~9000 records...What is going on here? This performance is
> pitiful.
Sheetal D [MSFT] - 28 Feb 2006 21:49 GMT
Also, have a look at the following article:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/office/understanding/infopath/default.aspx?pull=/libra
ry/en-us/odc_ip2003
_ta/html/officeinfopathtroubleshootperformancebestpracticeguidelines.asp
Best Regards,
Sheetal D, MCSD.NET
Microsoft Developer Support
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
Thread-Topic: Very Sow Performance
thread-index: AcY72Lvlk+yPI6DhTGuOTK7aOexWhQ==
X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 65.242.108.146
From: "=?Utf-8?B?QkZTbWl0aA==?=" <BFSmith@discussions.microsoft.com>
References: <7A7EC538-6031-47F4-B299-69D9F73141CB@microsoft.com>
Subject: RE: Very Sow Performance
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:02:27 -0800
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <B4AABC96-436C-4634-8AD7-11779629B956@microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.infopath
NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.infopath:27243
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.infopath
I was able to reduce the size of the Returned Data Set from the view and
performance is acceptable now...but WATCH OUT....large data sets will cripple
a DDLB!
> I have noticed some VERY slow performance...nearly unacceptably so...when
> dealing with a DDLB that gets its data from a secondary data source...in this
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> only contains ~9000 records...What is going on here? This performance is
> pitiful.