Thanks for your input. Do you mean that something like Palm Hotsync would
interfere with the ability to shut the program down? An AntiVirus program
might do this, which is something we're all told we should NEVER turn off?
OTOH, if there are that many programs that can interfere with something as
simple (it seems to me) as the ability of a major program to shut down (a
program designed by the creators of the *OS* for heaven's sake) then it
appears all is lost. How can I possibly hope to keep all the programs
harmonized when I'm not a programmer and just want the program to work well?
The programs you say would interfere are mostly background programs that
don't even have a convenient way to shut them down? How could I ever
learn/remember the ideal order in which to laboriously shut down all these
programs? Or, why can't Microsoft craft a simple Shortcuts backup utility so
if they get lost then can be quickly restored? Can't they program into
Outlook the ability to break the links to other programs during shutdown?
And so on and so forth.
What you've written gives me a shred of insight into the cause of the
problem, but it gives me no additional hope that the situation will be
resolved in a way that is in any way controllable or convenient.
Elliot Berlin
> This is a public forum where Microsoft employees rarely tread. In any
> event, have you ruled out the possibility that you have a 3rd party program
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> >
> > Elliot Berlin
> Thanks for your input. Do you mean that something like Palm Hotsync
> would interfere with the ability to shut the program down?
Beyond a doubt, if you have a PDA cradled and synching with Outlook, that
that sync program will keep Outlook open.
> An AntiVirus program might do this, which is something we're all told we
> should NEVER turn off?
I consider it rare that an AV program would do this. WIndows Desktop
Search, however (since you mention Vista), is also a likely culprit.
> OTOH, if there are that many programs that can
> interfere with something as simple (it seems to me) as the ability of
> a major program to shut down (a program designed by the creators of
> the *OS* for heaven's sake) then it appears all is lost.
It's difficult to imagine how Microsoft can control the programming
abilities of all the non-Microsoft programmers who write applications for
Windows.

Signature
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]
Tengu - 25 Sep 2007 15:22 GMT
This message doesn't seem to have taken the first time. If it's a duplicate
I'm sorry.
1.) I have never, so far as I know, tried to shut down my computer when it's
attached to my PDA and a sync program.
2.) I'm glad to hear that an AV program would probably not interfere.
3.) I rarely use Windows Desktop Search, preferring Google Desktop. How in
"heck" does a search program that appears to go off immediately after
delivering a result interfere with the internal workings of Outlook, so that
it might corrupt customization files? If it does that it should never have
been implemented in the first place.
4.) If Microsoft lacks the brains or resolve to set guidelines so that third
party programs don't interfere with its signature programs then they need to
go back to the drawing board and think about the users not just the programs.
With $14billion in annual profits I think Microsoft could find a way to fund
the R&D to develop a program that shuts down without corrupting its own
files. Can you tell me you don't agree with that?
> > Thanks for your input. Do you mean that something like Palm Hotsync
> > would interfere with the ability to shut the program down?
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> abilities of all the non-Microsoft programmers who write applications for
> Windows.
Brian Tillman - 25 Sep 2007 21:19 GMT
> 3.) I rarely use Windows Desktop Search, preferring Google Desktop.
Google Desktop seach is one of the major causes of what you see, I believe.
> How in "heck" does a search program that appears to go off
> immediately after delivering a result interfere with the internal
> workings of Outlook, so that it might corrupt customization files?
> If it does that it should never have been implemented in the first
> place.
You'll have to ask Google that.
> 4.) If Microsoft lacks the brains or resolve to set guidelines so
> that third party programs don't interfere with its signature programs
> then they need to go back to the drawing board and think about the
> users not just the programs.
They can set all the guidelines they wish, but they are still "guidelines"
and certainly not enforceable.
> With $14billion in annual profits I
> think Microsoft could find a way to fund the R&D to develop a program
> that shuts down without corrupting its own files. Can you tell me
> you don't agree with that?
Windows search doesn't interfere with Outlook, in my experience. It has
never done so for me.

Signature
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]