One can only add a single sender at a time to the "Blocked Senders" list. At
times I get up to several dozen spams in one download and it would be
convenient to be able to select them all at once for adding to the "Blocked
Senders" list.
An often requested feature that may be added to a future version of Outlook.

Signature
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.
After furious head scratching, + Shayne asked:
| One can only add a single sender at a time to the "Blocked Senders"
| list. At times I get up to several dozen spams in one download and it
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
| button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft
| Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=3adab024-2826-4
116-962e-1c760643148d&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.general
I wholeheartedly agree it is time consuming and because of that, one tends
to delete them in bulk rather than adding them to blocked senders. Amazed
that it hasn't been done before!! Better be in the next one or i'm changing
to another program. Couldn't fine the "I agree" button I'm new to this forum.

Signature
Fiji Bob
> One can only add a single sender at a time to the "Blocked Senders" list. At
> times I get up to several dozen spams in one download and it would be
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=3adab024-2826-4
116-962e-1c760643148d&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.general
Diane Poremsky - 31 Oct 2007 20:57 GMT
It's not supported because it’s a horrible way to deal with spam - 99.9% of
spam comes from a fake address that is only used once. The blocked senders
list would be in the billions with most address never used. The blocked list
should be for annoying people or companies who keep sending you email and
they won't remove your address or the procedure is too much bother.
http://www.slipstick.com/emo/2004/up040930.htm#safe
If the spam filter on high is not effective, find a better filter.
http://www.slipstick.com/rules/junkmail.asp
BTW - there is a limit to the total number of names that can go on the
blocked and safe lists - its better to save the space for addresses that
should not be marked as spam rather than filling it with single use
addresses.
http://www.slipstick.com/emo/2004/up040722.htm#safe

Signature
Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
Author, Teach Yourself Outlook 2003 in 24 Hours
Need Help with Common Tasks? http://www.outlook-tips.net/beginner/
Outlook 2007: http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/ol2007/
Outlook Tips by email:
dailytips-subscribe-request@lists.outlooktips.net
Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/
Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com
Subscribe to Exchange Messaging Outlook newsletter:
EMO-NEWSLETTER-SUBSCRIBE-REQUEST@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
> I wholeheartedly agree it is time consuming and because of that, one tends
> to delete them in bulk rather than adding them to blocked senders. Amazed
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=3adab024-2826-4
116-962e-1c760643148d&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.general