I am using Exchange 2003 with Outlook 2003. I have a user's calendar to
which several people (the user and his assistants) have full access. I want
to know how to see the history of an appointment:
• Which user created the appointment and when?
• Which user(s) made any modifications and when?
I know that I can see the date of the most recent modification in the
Properties window of the appointment, but I am looking for the full history
of its creation and modifications.
> I am using Exchange 2003 with Outlook 2003. I have a user's calendar
> to which several people (the user and his assistants) have full
> access. I want to know how to see the history of an appointment:
>
> • Which user created the appointment and when?
The From field should contain this information.
> • Which user(s) made any modifications and when?
I don't know if the From field will be changed to reflect the name of the
changer (I don't have access to a shared calendar to test and the public
calendar to which I do have access won't let me change anything I didn't
post originally), but the Modified field should contain the date it was
changed.
> I know that I can see the date of the most recent modification in the
> Properties window of the appointment, but I am looking for the full
> history of its creation and modifications.
Outlook doesn't keep a full history so there's no way you're going to see
one.

Signature
Brian Tillman
Roshan Q - 10 Jan 2006 22:27 GMT
Brian,
Thanks for the quick and knowledgeable reply. I did not state that these
appointments were all made by the user or one of his assistants directly in
the user's calendar, so I'm unsure if the "From" field would apply as there
were not Invitations.
At any rate, I got the gist of it, which is that this type of history is not
kept in Outlook/Exchange.
thanks,
roshan
> > I am using Exchange 2003 with Outlook 2003. I have a user's calendar
> > to which several people (the user and his assistants) have full
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Outlook doesn't keep a full history so there's no way you're going to see
> one.