> I'm sorry, I thought it was obvious; why can reminders be set for a
> time that has already past? The reminder will never be triggered.
The most logical reason seems to me to be that the writers of Outlook didn't
implement a check, but I don't see why anyone should care. It certainly
doesn't hurt anything to set the reminder for some time in the past. I'd
like to know why you think it's an issue.

Signature
Brian Tillman
Ken Slovak - [MVP - Outlook] - 26 Jan 2006 15:02 GMT
Older versions of Outlook didn't allow a reminder on an item in the past.
There were lots of complaints so it was changed in Outlook 2003. You can't
please everyone <shrug>. The reminder would fire immediately on a past due
reminder but if one doesn't want that it's certainly easy enough to kill the
reminder flag before saving the item. And how many people create past due
appointments very often?

Signature
Ken Slovak
[MVP - Outlook]
http://www.slovaktech.com
Author: Absolute Beginner's Guide to Microsoft Office Outlook 2003
Reminder Manager, Extended Reminders, Attachment Options
http://www.slovaktech.com/products.htm
>> I'm sorry, I thought it was obvious; why can reminders be set for a
>> time that has already past? The reminder will never be triggered.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> certainly doesn't hurt anything to set the reminder for some time in the
> past. I'd like to know why you think it's an issue.
Dan1roda - 14 Feb 2006 22:40 GMT
Yes people don't often set a reminder in the past on purpose, but if you do
it by mistake you will never be notified of the important task. I can't
think of a reason why you would want to set a reminder in the past. Why
would people complain about that?
> Older versions of Outlook didn't allow a reminder on an item in the past.
> There were lots of complaints so it was changed in Outlook 2003. You can't
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> > certainly doesn't hurt anything to set the reminder for some time in the
> > past. I'd like to know why you think it's an issue.
Dan1roda - 14 Feb 2006 22:41 GMT
If it is done by mistake you may miss an important task. No?
> > I'm sorry, I thought it was obvious; why can reminders be set for a
> > time that has already past? The reminder will never be triggered.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> doesn't hurt anything to set the reminder for some time in the past. I'd
> like to know why you think it's an issue.