
Signature
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.
After furious head scratching, Amadomon asked:
| No real need to respond to this. I too came from a proprietary s/w
| world, and am not doctrinaire, but I have gradually been migrating
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
|||||| I use a FOSS calendaring system, while the rest of my office uses
|||||| Outlook. Can I publish my .iCal file to our exchange server?
You don't even know what software I am talking about, so how can you call it
second-rate? I have conceded that there is plenty of "crap" (as you
characterized it) out there, and I have also used qualifiers such as
"frequently" and said that *I* am not doctrinaire. I find this discussion
rather ironic, because I am usually on the other side of this argument
(albeit employing a nicer, less "scorched-earth" approach) with my hard-core
FOSS friends. But yes, that *is* what it is all about: customization--the
right tool for the job at hand. Have you ever tried to outfit 400 computers
for schools in sub-Saharan Africa? Can you imagine the licence expense, to
say nothing of the localisation costs? Add to that the hardware--and
power--needed to run bloated operating systems, when low-cost, lean,
customized OS's and apps exist (yes, with active local support) that can run
on flash memory, and your idea of "crap" and "second-rate" might change.
It truly is a Flat World, my friend. Companies like Microsoft, and the US
in general, ignore this at their peril. No one is trying to emulate
Microsoft; they're just applying the principle of Occam's Razor.
I run my OS, my email client, and my calendar app (among other apps) on a
USB key; wherever I go, regardless of native OS, I simply plug in my key
and--boom--there is "my" computer. Afterwards, I simply unplug my key and
off I go, leaving nothing behind. Try that with Outlook.
> Dream on - have it your way - after all, that is what F/OSS is all about -
> having choices from second rate software, which is always trying to emulate
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> |||||| I use a FOSS calendaring system, while the rest of my office uses
> |||||| Outlook. Can I publish my .iCal file to our exchange server?
Amadomon - 04 Mar 2006 03:06 GMT
I might add, after looking at other Outlook-related discussion threads, that
I don't see much evidence to indicate that the MS product is in any way
superior. ("Outlook crashes when new appointment is saved in Outlook
Calendaring") After listening to you, I would expect that the brilliant
minds at Microsoft could do better than that. Finally (to return to the
original topic of this thread), I believe that either the current or else the
next version of Outlook will support the (open) iCalendar format. Who's
emulating whom?
> You don't even know what software I am talking about, so how can you call it
> second-rate? I have conceded that there is plenty of "crap" (as you
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
> > |||||| I use a FOSS calendaring system, while the rest of my office uses
> > |||||| Outlook. Can I publish my .iCal file to our exchange server?