 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWordDirectoryUser Groups Related Topics Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ... |
MS Office Forum / Outlook / Calendaring / July 2006KB916803 - preventing mailbox being deleivered to .pst
I recently experienced a problem where outlook clients, who use both exchange and POP3 to receive their email (they use 2 profiles and have their mail sent to a shared .pst) were unable to receive appointments to their delivery location i.e. their .pst, from the exchange server . This was not acceptable as these clients travel outside the domain and rightly expect to get their mail delevered as they have come to expect when using POP3. After a bit of research the culprit for this problem turned out to be the exchange server update KB916803. Hopefully, this will serve both as an aid to others experiencing similar problems and a push to microsoft to sort this update out. > I recently experienced a problem where outlook clients, who use both > exchange and POP3 to receive their email (they use 2 profiles and > have their mail sent to a shared .pst) were unable to receive > appointments to their delivery location i.e. their .pst, from the > exchange server . Why are they not using Cached Exchange mode and VPN or RPC over HTTP to connect to the Exchange server on the road so that they don't need more than one account?  SignatureBrian Tillman > > I recently experienced a problem where outlook clients, who use both > > exchange and POP3 to receive their email (they use 2 profiles and [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > connect to the Exchange server on the road so that they don't need more than > one account? > they do use a VPN over the internet .whether or not the client has > connected to exchange or POP3, the issue is that this update > prevents calender appointments being extracted to a personal > folder's inbox. for those without 2003 and a limited sized mailbox- > also a scenario i cover, this could be an issue and the update is > the cause. My point is that if your server is an Exchange server, then you have no need to use PSTs. SignatureBrian Tillman > > they do use a VPN over the internet .whether or not the client has > > connected to exchange or POP3, the issue is that this update [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > My point is that if your server is an Exchange server, then you have no need > to use PSTs. however, this still doesn't detract from the previous issue of the calender limitations caused by the update to a pst. but i'm wondering if you have a constructive solution or any idea to the original findings concerning mail delivered to a pst, aside from dont deliver to a pst try switching the default email account from the exchange server to the pop3 account? This has worked for me. > I recently experienced a problem where outlook clients, who use both exchange > and POP3 to receive their email (they use 2 profiles and have their mail sent [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Hopefully, this will serve both as an aid to others experiencing similar > problems and a push to microsoft to sort this update out. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.