If you have all the invitations going to the delegate and only the delegate and certain other trusted parties with write access to the calendar, why doesn't that work? The delegate can decide what to do with each request.

Signature
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
>I have been given requirements to setup an executives calendar so that no
> meetings show up on it that are not approved by a delegate or put on there by
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> ideas or a solution that would work for managing an executive type calendar I
> would be appreciative.
TonyH - 07 Sep 2006 15:59 GMT
They don't want anyone to be able to do meeting requests to the executives.
Hence the original rule to delete and respond with a message. The problem
there is that there have been instances where meeting requests appeared to
get through ignoring the rule. Is it possible if you have a delegate that a
meeting that got deleted by the inbox rule on the delegated inbox would show
up on the calendar because it showed up in the delegates box?
Tony
> If you have all the invitations going to the delegate and only the delegate and certain other trusted parties with write access to the calendar, why doesn't that work? The delegate can decide what to do with each request.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> > ideas or a solution that would work for managing an executive type calendar I
> > would be appreciative.
Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] - 07 Sep 2006 16:15 GMT
> They don't want anyone to be able to do meeting requests to the executives.
Maybe I don't understand what you mean by that. If you have the delegate set up to get all requests, then the executive will never see those requests.
Are you saying that you want any request sent to the executive to be bounced? I don't understand the advantage of doing that over using the delegate feature as designed.

Signature
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
> They don't want anyone to be able to do meeting requests to the executives.
> Hence the original rule to delete and respond with a message. The problem
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>> > ideas or a solution that would work for managing an executive type calendar I
>> > would be appreciative.
TonyH - 07 Sep 2006 18:43 GMT
> Are you saying that you want any request sent to the executive to be bounced? I don't understand the advantage of doing that over using the
delegate feature as designed.
The thought is that they want the executives time completely scheduled by
their assistant. They want all his time scheduled by people calling the
assistant and then categorizing and prioritizing the meetings. As is the
assistant marks all of the executives time as full whether there are actual
meetings there or not since we know of know way to hide the executives "free
time" without breaking free/busy all together for the individual.
TonyH
> > They don't want anyone to be able to do meeting requests to the executives.
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> >> > ideas or a solution that would work for managing an executive type calendar I
> >> > would be appreciative.
TonyH - 07 Sep 2006 16:19 GMT
They want all meeting requests to go through the executive assistant. When a
meeting invite comes in and sits in the inbox it goes on the calendar as
tentative till something is done with it accepted or declined/deleted. At
this point the meeting would then get synched to the executives phone and
give them notifications of meetings. Is there a way to make it so meeting
requests don't show up on the calendar at all till they are accepted? Or is
there some way to setup a server side rule on the delegates mailbox that will
also delete the delegated meeting invitations. I tried setting a rule up on
the delegates mailbox that kicked off when a meeting invite or update came in
sent to the delegated inbox that sent a reply telling them to call a specific
person to schedule all meetings with this person and then deleted the
message, to keep it from getting on the calendar. This did not fire though
when the delegate received the meeting requests.
> If you have all the invitations going to the delegate and only the delegate and certain other trusted parties with write access to the calendar, why doesn't that work? The delegate can decide what to do with each request.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> > ideas or a solution that would work for managing an executive type calendar I
> > would be appreciative.
Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] - 07 Sep 2006 16:59 GMT
> Is there a way to make it so meeting
> requests don't show up on the calendar at all till they are accepted?
Tools | Options | E-mail Options | Tracking Options >> turn off the option for "Process requests and responses on arrival"

Signature
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
> They want all meeting requests to go through the executive assistant. When a
> meeting invite comes in and sits in the inbox it goes on the calendar as
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>> If you have all the invitations going to the delegate and only the delegate and certain other trusted parties with write access to the calendar, why doesn't that work? The delegate can decide what to do with each request.
>>
>> >I have been given requirements to setup an executives calendar so that no
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>> > ideas or a solution that would work for managing an executive type calendar I
>> > would be appreciative.