Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Outlook / Calendaring / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Executive Calendar Setup

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
TonyH - 06 Sep 2006 22:28 GMT
I have been given requirements to setup an executives calendar so that no
meetings show up on it that are not approved by a delegate or put on there by
specific people.  I originally setup this up using a server side rule on the
inbox that deleted all incoming meeting requests that were not from specific
people and responded with a message to call that persons assistant to
schedule a meeting.  This worked initially but is broken if you set a person
as a true delegate being the only one receiving meeting invites, as the
invites don't go into the delegated mailbox anymore.  I tried setting up a
rule on the delegates inbox to kick off for meeting invitations sent to the
delegated user but they never kicked off when I tested.  I also had an issue
where a user using a blackberry that syncs with a BCE server got an invite
that didn't get deleted in time and started raising cane.  If anyone has
ideas or a solution that would work for managing an executive type calendar I
would be appreciative.
Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] - 06 Sep 2006 23:08 GMT
If you have all the invitations going to the delegate and only the delegate and certain other trusted parties with write access to the calendar, why doesn't that work? The delegate can decide what to do with each request.

Signature

Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
  Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
    http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
  and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
    Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
    http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
 

>I have been given requirements to setup an executives calendar so that no
> meetings show up on it that are not approved by a delegate or put on there by
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> ideas or a solution that would work for managing an executive type calendar I
> would be appreciative.
TonyH - 07 Sep 2006 15:59 GMT
They don't want anyone to be able to do meeting requests to the executives.  
Hence the original rule to delete and respond with a message.  The problem
there is that there have been instances where meeting requests appeared to
get through ignoring the rule.  Is it possible if you have a delegate that a
meeting that got deleted by the inbox rule on the delegated inbox would show
up on the calendar because it showed up in the delegates box?

Tony

> If you have all the invitations going to the delegate and only the delegate and certain other trusted parties with write access to the calendar, why doesn't that work? The delegate can decide what to do with each request.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> > ideas or a solution that would work for managing an executive type calendar I
> > would be appreciative.
Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] - 07 Sep 2006 16:15 GMT
> They don't want anyone to be able to do meeting requests to the executives.

Maybe I don't understand what you mean by that. If you have the delegate set up to get all requests, then the executive will never see those requests.

Are you saying that you want any request sent to the executive to be bounced? I don't understand the advantage of doing that over using the delegate feature as designed.

Signature

Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
  Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
    http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
  and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
    Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
    http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
 

> They don't want anyone to be able to do meeting requests to the executives.  
> Hence the original rule to delete and respond with a message.  The problem
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>> > ideas or a solution that would work for managing an executive type calendar I
>> > would be appreciative.
TonyH - 07 Sep 2006 18:43 GMT
> Are you saying that you want any request sent to the executive to be bounced? I don't understand the advantage of doing that over using the
delegate feature as designed.

The thought is that they want the executives time completely scheduled by
their assistant.  They want all his time scheduled by people calling the
assistant and then categorizing and prioritizing the meetings.  As is the
assistant marks all of the executives time as full whether there are actual
meetings there or not since we know of know way to hide the executives "free
time" without breaking free/busy all together for the individual.

TonyH

> > They don't want anyone to be able to do meeting requests to the executives.
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> >> > ideas or a solution that would work for managing an executive type calendar I
> >> > would be appreciative.
TonyH - 07 Sep 2006 16:19 GMT
They want all meeting requests to go through the executive assistant.  When a
meeting invite comes in and sits in the inbox it goes on the calendar as
tentative till something is done with it accepted or declined/deleted.  At
this point the meeting would then get synched to the executives phone and
give them notifications of meetings.  Is there a way to make it so meeting
requests don't show up on the calendar at all till they are accepted? Or is
there some way to setup a server side rule on the delegates mailbox that will
also delete the delegated meeting invitations.  I tried setting a rule up on
the delegates mailbox that kicked off when a meeting invite or update came in
sent to the delegated inbox that sent a reply telling them to call a specific
person to schedule all meetings with this person and then deleted the
message, to keep it from getting on the calendar.  This did not fire though
when the delegate received the meeting requests.

> If you have all the invitations going to the delegate and only the delegate and certain other trusted parties with write access to the calendar, why doesn't that work? The delegate can decide what to do with each request.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> > ideas or a solution that would work for managing an executive type calendar I
> > would be appreciative.
Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] - 07 Sep 2006 16:59 GMT
> Is there a way to make it so meeting
> requests don't show up on the calendar at all till they are accepted?

Tools | Options | E-mail Options | Tracking Options >> turn off the option for "Process requests and responses on arrival"

Signature

Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
  Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
    http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
  and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
    Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
    http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
 

> They want all meeting requests to go through the executive assistant.  When a
> meeting invite comes in and sits in the inbox it goes on the calendar as
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>> If you have all the invitations going to the delegate and only the delegate and certain other trusted parties with write access to the calendar, why doesn't that work? The delegate can decide what to do with each request.

>>    
>> >I have been given requirements to setup an executives calendar so that no
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>> > ideas or a solution that would work for managing an executive type calendar I
>> > would be appreciative.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.