> Exchange 2007 will be the first version to support that.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> > who is the meeting organizer.
> > Does someone know ??
What Exchange+Outlook 2007 offers goes beyond what earlier versions offer. Users will be able to hide not just appointment details but also hide all availability information (what I call the "exalted executive" option). A user can apply four different levels of free/busy access -- from none to full -- on a user-by-user basis, just as you might do with folder permissions. (In fact, the controls are on the Permission tab.)
What you're seeing is more likely to be related to the permissions on the users' Calendar folders.

Signature
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
> Outlook 2007 is the first version to allow users to hide the details of their
> appointments from other users who are able to view their busy/free schedule?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>> Exchange 2007 will be the first version to support that.
>>
>> > We are currently testing out resource booking in outlook. We experience that
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> > who is the meeting organizer.
>> > Does someone know ??
trncgb - 06 Feb 2007 20:48 GMT
I'm finding if I mark a meeting private that has a resource, it locks up the
meeing. It can't be deleted, opened, canceled, etc. I am an owner of that
resource.
> What Exchange+Outlook 2007 offers goes beyond what earlier versions offer. Users will be able to hide not just appointment details but also hide all availability information (what I call the "exalted executive" option). A user can apply four different levels of free/busy access -- from none to full -- on a user-by-user basis, just as you might do with folder permissions. (In fact, the controls are on the Permission tab.)
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> >> > who is the meeting organizer.
> >> > Does someone know ??