> Is User C set as a delegate for User B? That's more than just calendar access.
>
> > User-A sent a meeting request to User-B and then gets an Out of Office reply
> > from User-C. User-B and User-C can access each others calendar, is that why
> > that happens?
Exactly. That's how meeting requests and messages normally work. Maybe User C shouldn't be a delegate?

Signature
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of Microsoft Outlook 2007 Programming:
Jumpstart for Power Users and Administrators
http://www.outlookcode.com/article.aspx?id=54
> Yes, they are delegates for each other, but they don't get OOOs on the other
> persons messages, just meeting requests.
>
>> Is User C set as a delegate for User B? That's more than just calendar access.
>> > User-A sent a meeting request to User-B and then gets an Out of Office reply
>> > from User-C. User-B and User-C can access each others calendar, is that why
>> > that happens?
dlw - 13 Jun 2007 15:56 GMT
Probably, this is not a case where the delegate is someone's assistant and
keeping their calendar for them. It's just two admin assistants who
occasionally need access to each others calendar.
> Exactly. That's how meeting requests and messages normally work. Maybe User C shouldn't be a delegate?
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> >> > from User-C. User-B and User-C can access each others calendar, is that why
> >> > that happens?
Brian Tillman - 13 Jun 2007 20:54 GMT
> Probably, this is not a case where the delegate is someone's
> assistant and keeping their calendar for them. It's just two admin
> assistants who occasionally need access to each others calendar.
I don't believe you need to add someone as a delegate in order to allow them
access to your calendar. Sharing the calendar should be sufficient.

Signature
Brian Tillman