Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Outlook / Calendaring / July 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Free/Busy scheduling issue...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
KHauer - 02 Jul 2007 23:32 GMT
Environment: Exchange Server 2003 (single server), Outlook XP & 2K3 clients

Issue: Nearly all of our users have their free/busy scheduling set to
publish the 2 month default, updating the server at 15 minutes intervals.
We've noticed two oddities -
  1. Outlook apparently considers the current month as "month 1,"
regardless of the current date. Therefore, if we're looking at a users
schedule on July 29th, we can still only see the schedule through August
31st, not through late September, as one would intuitively expect. Is this
behavior by design?
  2. As of 3PM on July 2nd, the schedules of at least two users in the
organization still only display through the end of July, even though their
free/busy schedule setting is at the 2 month default. I've verified that the
users have logged into the network and have been actively using their Outlook
clients today. Why is this happening?

Thanks for any imput!
Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] - 02 Jul 2007 23:41 GMT
1) Yes.

2) Have they created any new appointments lately?

Signature

Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
  Author of Microsoft Outlook 2007 Programming:
    Jumpstart for Power Users and Administrators
   http://www.outlookcode.com/article.aspx?id=54

> Environment: Exchange Server 2003 (single server), Outlook XP & 2K3 clients
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Thanks for any imput!
KHauer - 03 Jul 2007 00:14 GMT
1. That design seems somewhat counter-intuitive, but I'm glad to know it's
not a bug.

2. No, they hadn't, and doing so resolved the issue. Thank you, Sue!

> 1) Yes.
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> >
> > Thanks for any imput!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.