Share my calender w/ Outlook 2003

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

TSchuneman - 23 Oct 2004 20:35 GMT

I would like to share my calender with others. In the old Outlook 2000 I was
given the option to share my calender, contacts, & tasks. I believe all I had
to do was use the drop down menu, select "Share", and then select "Calender".
I could then email that share request to anyone listed in my Contacts. I
cannot find these options with Outlook 2003. I'm I simply missing something
simple? Thanks.

Reply to this Message

Diane Poremsky [MVP] - 23 Oct 2004 21:04 GMT

Are you using Exchange server or were you using Netfolders?

Signature

Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
Author, Teach Yourself Outlook 2003 in 24 Hours
Coauthor, OneNote 2003 for Windows (Visual QuickStart Guide)
Author, Google and Other Search Engines (Visual QuickStart Guide)

Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/
Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com
Join OneNote Tips mailing list: http://www.onenote-tips.net/

>I would like to share my calender with others. In the old Outlook 2000 I
>was
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> something
> simple? Thanks.

Reply to this Message

Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook] - 24 Oct 2004 14:49 GMT

Net folders were put out of their misery in Outlook 2002. See this page for
some options with 2003:
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/share.htm

Signature

--?
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due to
the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my personal
account will be deleted without reading.

After furious head scratching, TSchuneman asked:

| I would like to share my calender with others. In the old Outlook
| 2000 I was given the option to share my calender, contacts, & tasks.
| I believe all I had to do was use the drop down menu, select "Share",
| and then select "Calender". I could then email that share request to
| anyone listed in my Contacts. I cannot find these options with
| Outlook 2003. I'm I simply missing something simple? Thanks.

Reply to this Message