Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Outlook / Contacts / November 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

User defined field filter issue

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
BnB - 18 Nov 2004 19:07 GMT
I have defined a Yes/No user-defined field in the top-level contacts folder.
I have another level of folders beneath it. When I defined the field, I
defined it to apply to all subfolders beneath, and indeed I can add and view
those fields in all folders.

But I can't seem to filter. To add a filter, I have to refine the view in
the top-level Contacts folder, where I defined the fields. Only there are the
new fields visible in the pick-list for defining the filter criteria. The
filter works in this folder. But it doesn't work in the subfolders. When I
look at the view definition in them, rather than a simple definition of the
criteria, there's a strange cryptic reference to the schema somewhere. And
the picklist for fields doesn't recognize the user fields, even though they
are displayed in the view.

Am I doing something wrong here or does this just not work as expected?

Thanks,
BnB
Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] - 18 Nov 2004 19:37 GMT
I have no idea what you might have done to define the field on subfolders. I
know of no Outlook technique to do that. I'd suggest that you make sure the
field is explicitly defined in each subfolder.

Signature

Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of
    Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
    Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
    http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx

>I have defined a Yes/No user-defined field in the top-level contacts
>folder.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> Thanks,
> BnB
BnB - 18 Nov 2004 23:09 GMT
Ugh... even more frustrating now, since I can't recreate what I did. I KNOW I
did it, because it worked, up to a point (clearly). But the whole thing isn't
very intuitive, so I think it was hard to figure out the first time, and now
I am stumped. It's incredibly inefficient to have to define the fields
individually per folder. Talk about a maintenance nightmare. (Every time a
new folder is created, you have to remember which fields to add.) So... maybe
instead of a field I'll use categories.

I'm trying to work around the many limitations on folders as they affect a
mail merge. If I use categories instead of a field, then I can only span
multiple folders using "Search" instead of a view, as far as I can tell (it
doesn't seem like a view can collect subfolder contents). Can I use search
results for a mail merge?

BnB

> I have no idea what you might have done to define the field on subfolders. I
> know of no Outlook technique to do that. I'd suggest that you make sure the
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> > Thanks,
> > BnB
Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] - 19 Nov 2004 02:21 GMT
No, you can't use search results for a mail merge. You might very well be
better off keeping data in a single folder and using categories to
distinguish different types of items.
Signature

Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of
    Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
    Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
    http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx

> Ugh... even more frustrating now, since I can't recreate what I did. I
> KNOW I
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> doesn't seem like a view can collect subfolder contents). Can I use search
> results for a mail merge?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.