I have no idea what you might have done to define the field on subfolders. I
know of no Outlook technique to do that. I'd suggest that you make sure the
field is explicitly defined in each subfolder.

Signature
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of
Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
Ugh... even more frustrating now, since I can't recreate what I did. I KNOW I
did it, because it worked, up to a point (clearly). But the whole thing isn't
very intuitive, so I think it was hard to figure out the first time, and now
I am stumped. It's incredibly inefficient to have to define the fields
individually per folder. Talk about a maintenance nightmare. (Every time a
new folder is created, you have to remember which fields to add.) So... maybe
instead of a field I'll use categories.
I'm trying to work around the many limitations on folders as they affect a
mail merge. If I use categories instead of a field, then I can only span
multiple folders using "Search" instead of a view, as far as I can tell (it
doesn't seem like a view can collect subfolder contents). Can I use search
results for a mail merge?
BnB
> I have no idea what you might have done to define the field on subfolders. I
> know of no Outlook technique to do that. I'd suggest that you make sure the
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> > Thanks,
> > BnB
Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] - 19 Nov 2004 02:21 GMT
No, you can't use search results for a mail merge. You might very well be
better off keeping data in a single folder and using categories to
distinguish different types of items.

Signature
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of
Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
> Ugh... even more frustrating now, since I can't recreate what I did. I
> KNOW I
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> doesn't seem like a view can collect subfolder contents). Can I use search
> results for a mail merge?