I have just finished compiling a distribution list, and upon reviewing
that list I notice that some of the little Rolodex card icons that
appear to the left of each name have a little head on them and some do
not. What is the significance of the little head?
Jen - 04 Jan 2005 21:01 GMT
> I have just finished compiling a distribution list, and upon reviewing
> that list I notice that some of the little Rolodex card icons that
> appear to the left of each name have a little head on them and some do
> not. What is the significance of the little head?
It's just showing that you have more than one person within that list. It
should actually be more than one head... like 3 profiles.
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 04 Jan 2005 21:14 GMT
Those are the Contacts who graduated in the upper half of their class.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
>I have just finished compiling a distribution list, and upon reviewing
> that list I notice that some of the little Rolodex card icons that
> appear to the left of each name have a little head on them and some do
> not. What is the significance of the little head?
C. Davey Utter - 05 Jan 2005 19:34 GMT
No...really...what does it mean? LOL
>Those are the Contacts who graduated in the upper half of their class.
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 05 Jan 2005 20:06 GMT
Actually, each version of Outlook has used a different icon for a Contact
item. I suspect you created some of these Contacts in different versions of
Outlook.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> No...really...what does it mean? LOL
>
>>Those are the Contacts who graduated in the upper half of their class.
C. Davey Utter - 05 Jan 2005 20:49 GMT
Ah yes, that could very well be. I have used both 2000 and 2003.
Thanks.
>Actually, each version of Outlook has used a different icon for a Contact
>item. I suspect you created some of these Contacts in different versions of
>Outlook.
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 05 Jan 2005 21:06 GMT
I liked my first answer better. Since Outlook knows everything, it probably
does know which of your Contacts were in the top half of their class.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> Ah yes, that could very well be. I have used both 2000 and 2003.
> Thanks.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>of
>>Outlook.
C. Davey Utter - 06 Jan 2005 18:19 GMT
It was a fine answer!
>I liked my first answer better. Since Outlook knows everything, it probably
>does know which of your Contacts were in the top half of their class.