Not really. I'm struggling to understand why it matters. Why is this so
important?

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
Hi Russ,
The reason it matters in a business setting is, as silly
as this may seem, the pecking order of things. For
example, if the president of a company receives an email
from one of his employees that is also addressed to 9
other employees, the president, if he is sensitive to
such things, might expect his name to be the first in the
list of recipients OR he would probably be OK if his name
is in the alphabetical order with the other names. But
the way Outlook 2002 seems to work now, the last person's
name in the list of recipients jumps to the top of the
list and the rest follow alphabetically. Since Outlook
puts the names in the Distribution List alphabetically,
it seems curious that, when you use the Distribution List
when sending an email, the names appear in a different
order.
>-----Original Message-----
>Not really. I'm struggling to understand why it matters. Why is this so
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>.
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 09 Sep 2003 02:12 GMT
Goodness.
Then you don't want to use a DL since you can't control how the names will
be expanded. Use a Category or a Contacts Subfolder instead to create your
list of multiple recipients.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> Hi Russ,
> The reason it matters in a business setting is, as silly
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> >
> >.
Kelly Henry - 10 Sep 2003 00:18 GMT
Hi Russ -
Thanks for your reply. I understand how a Contacts
Subfolder can help with keeping a makeshift distribution
list alphabetical (when sending an email, click "To",
then select the Contacts Subfolder and add the names as
desired), but I don't understand how a Category could be
used for a distribution list. Could you help me with this?
Thanks.
>-----Original Message-----
>Goodness.
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>
>.