Outlook 2000 allowed this, and I feel it is a step backward in the 2003
version that doesn't allow Contacts to be sorted by Category. Is there
something I'm missing?
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 24 Mar 2005 11:30 GMT
Both versions work the same.
Why do you think they do not?

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> Outlook 2000 allowed this, and I feel it is a step backward in the 2003
> version that doesn't allow Contacts to be sorted by Category. Is there
> something I'm missing?
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 24 Mar 2005 13:09 GMT
Or perhaps you meant how Outlook sorts within Categories, not by Categories.
That changed.
Clarify your post.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> Outlook 2000 allowed this, and I feel it is a step backward in the 2003
> version that doesn't allow Contacts to be sorted by Category. Is there
> something I'm missing?