
Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
Thanks Valentine,
I got that.
Exactly this way, parsing Name fields via Full Name button, contact's full
name field get confused: Churchill Spencer John instead of Churchill John
Spencer, even though I enter: Churchill - Last Name, John - First Name,
Spencer - Middle Name. In spite of the fact that Spencer is labelled as
'Middle' name, when full name starts with last name, it should not be in the
middle, going before the first name, isn't it? Oppositely, in this case
middle name should FOLLOW the first name.
My settings for full name (Parameters - contact parameters) is 'Lastname
Firstname'.
BTW, is there an option for field 'Full Name' to display Lastname F. M.
(i.e. FIrstname & Middlename's initials)?
Also, is the code you advised applicable for reformatting FullName fields
for already created contacts (I don't need that for File As field)?
Thanks again for your help.
> Click the Full Name button so you can parse the name elements into the
> First, Middle, Last fields. That way Outlook can't get confused.
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 21 Jun 2005 11:04 GMT
I can't repro that behavior and have not seen it reported.
When I parse the names correctly, the Full Name field is populated
correctly.
What version of Outlook is this? Was it a clean install? Have you tried to
reset your view?

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> Thanks Valentine,
>
[quoted text clipped - 75 lines]
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks
Alexander - 21 Jun 2005 14:47 GMT
What do you get entering in 'Full Name' field: First name: 'John'. Middle
Name: 'Spencer'. Last Name: 'Churchill'? Do you have 'Churchill John Spencer'
in the 'Full Name' field? (with 'Full Name' format set to 'LastName
FirstName')
Are we talking about Full Name field? Not File As or other?
Outlook 11, multiple instances, different configurations.
How to 'reset my view'?
Thanks!
> I can't repro that behavior and have not seen it reported.
> When I parse the names correctly, the Full Name field is populated
[quoted text clipped - 80 lines]
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 21 Jun 2005 19:27 GMT
I see the problem now. My mistake. I'm talking about the File As field.
That's the only one that matters to most users and the one that most users
are asking about since that's the one that appears in most views and by
which most views are sorted. The Full Name field is not used as an
individual field since normally people would use the individual name
elements. Also most users prefer the Full Name field to be in standard order
since they can configure their File As field to be in Last, First order to
control sorting.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> What do you get entering in 'Full Name' field: First name: 'John'. Middle
> Name: 'Spencer'. Last Name: 'Churchill'? Do you have 'Churchill John
[quoted text clipped - 105 lines]
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks
Alexander - 22 Jun 2005 10:15 GMT
Yes, I already settled 'File As' and other fields like it suits me the most,
but I can't override 'Full Name' mess so I apply to professionals.
For me (and perhaps many people) it makes sense for mobile sync. It can be
done often directly via Outlook address book without tricks with intermediate
file formats like .csv and others.
But what I see when trying to sync my phone with OAB (it uses 'Full Name'
natively) - first comes 'First Name', then 'Middle Name' and then 'Last Name'
(default full name settings in Outlook).
This is not convenient, as some (many) mobiles have their limitations for
number of symbols and often cut short the most important info - contact's
family name, which comes last, like this 'John Spencer Chu'.
So I change 'Full Name' field settings to 'LastName FirstName'. This way as
I already told I get 'Churchill Spencer John' instead of 'Churchill John
Spencer'. Phone will show something like 'Churchill Spencer Jo'.
Is there a way to force 'Full Name' field to return 'Churchill John Spencer'
or, ideally, 'Churchill J.S.' or 'Churchill JS'? And, what about batch
re-formatting of the old contacts to the new standard?
So actually problem is both in Outlook and custom mobile software, not only
Outlook. And yes I plan to buy a MS-Mobile phone (which hopefully will comply
with Outlook ideally), but not right now 8-)
> I see the problem now. My mistake. I'm talking about the File As field.
> That's the only one that matters to most users and the one that most users
[quoted text clipped - 113 lines]
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Thanks
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 22 Jun 2005 10:59 GMT
No way I know of. But it's a good question for one of the programming groups
since this would also require code. Someone may have tried to do it, but I'm
sure it's not as frequent a request as the File As... field.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> Yes, I already settled 'File As' and other fields like it suits me the
> most,
[quoted text clipped - 166 lines]
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Thanks