> Vince....no luck....still unable to populate.
When the utility started up, it asks for the folder you want to "resolve". If
you don't specify a folder, then the default is the "Contact" folder....makes
sense, right? So, the "first" time I ran the utility, I did not specify a
folder, assuming it would use the Contacts folder. Funny thing is that the
couple of items in the address book as a result of your earlier post (when I
tested editing, etc.) were deleted after the utility ran! I then ran the
utility again and specified the Contact folder and got the same results as
the first time.
> But editing the address of any existing contact adds them to the address
> book? Very odd since that's what the utility I mentioned should do
>
> > Vince....no luck....still unable to populate.
Devora - 07 Nov 2005 22:10 GMT
I also have Outlook 2003 and the same problem. And I ran the "resolved"
utility on the Contacts folder. Still get the same message: "The address
list could not be displayed...". I also removed the Outlook Address Book
profile, stopped Outlook, restarted and got the following message: "This
account or directory type already exists and cannot be specified twice" ( I
only had the one profile to choose from).
If it's important, I've been backing up the outlook.pst file between my
laptop and my desktop...
Thanks, Devora
> When the utility started up, it asks for the folder you want to "resolve". If
> you don't specify a folder, then the default is the "Contact" folder....makes
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> >
> > > Vince....no luck....still unable to populate.
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 07 Nov 2005 23:27 GMT
You've multiposted.
Read replies to your other posts and please stop multiposting.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
>I also have Outlook 2003 and the same problem. And I ran the "resolved"
> utility on the Contacts folder. Still get the same message: "The address
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>> >
>> > > Vince....no luck....still unable to populate.