One must wonder why you even need a DL if you are using Categories.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
Different benefits for different tasks.
When browsing to identify a contact from within a group, Category is useful
as a view selector.
But it's not convenient to "send to all" from such a view.
A distribution list is useful for entry on the "To:" subject line of a mail
composition window. Failing that, if there were a Category filter for the
Address Book name finder I'd be happy enough.
> One must wonder why you even need a DL if you are using Categories.
> > Outlook 2003 permits multiple personal contact lists, but they work by
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> >
> > http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=65b6656d-77f2-4
7c3-a827-0ece582b40bc&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.contacts
Brian Tillman - 19 Oct 2005 16:13 GMT
> Different benefits for different tasks.
> When browsing to identify a contact from within a group, Category is
> useful as a view selector.
> But it's not convenient to "send to all" from such a view.
So, selecting the category and clicking Actions>New Message to Contact isn't
easy enough?

Signature
Brian Tillman
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 19 Oct 2005 23:02 GMT
As Brian says, it's pretty darn easy to send to a Category, and far more
reliable than using a DL.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> Different benefits for different tasks.
> When browsing to identify a contact from within a group, Category is
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>> >
>> > http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=65b6656d-77f2-4
7c3-a827-0ece582b40bc&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.contacts