It is not possible for the Outlook Address Book not to match your Contacts.
The Outlook Address Book contains no data other than your Contacts. Tha't
what it displays.
Is anything really different other than the sort order? Just set the sort
order the way you want:
Tools > E-mail accounts > View or change existing directories or address
books > Outlook Address Book > Change.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
>I am using Microsoft Outlook with Word 2003 editor on Microsoft Windows NT
> Media Center Edition. My address book information does not match my
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> have researched everything I could find in the on-line help and nothing
> seemed to apply.
Judge Martha - 29 Nov 2005 14:37 GMT
In Contacts I have B, Allen - when I open the address book I have Allen B
with the display name showing as B, Allen. I am trying to get my address
book and contacts to match. Everyone in my contacts show up last name, first
name.
> It is not possible for the Outlook Address Book not to match your Contacts.
> The Outlook Address Book contains no data other than your Contacts. Tha't
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> > have researched everything I could find in the on-line help and nothing
> > seemed to apply.
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 29 Nov 2005 15:04 GMT
Was there something in my reply you did not understand?
Did you do what I suggested?

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> In Contacts I have B, Allen - when I open the address book I have Allen B
> with the display name showing as B, Allen. I am trying to get my address
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>> > have researched everything I could find in the on-line help and nothing
>> > seemed to apply.
Judge Martha - 02 Dec 2005 16:07 GMT
Thank you for your help - I think it is OK now. I am so busy that I had not
had time to double check everything.
> Was there something in my reply you did not understand?
> Did you do what I suggested?
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> >> > have researched everything I could find in the on-line help and nothing
> >> > seemed to apply.