Expected behavior. A DL can only contain electronic addresses. Why would you
put anything else in a DL?

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> We are using Outlook 2002 and 2003, and on this particular pc, 2002. What
> I
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> this is not the solution that is desired. Every time we go to make a dis.
> list it only shows those with an email address. Any ideas?
That's what I told him, but he wanted a way to have all addresses without an
email address in one container. After poking around a bit in Outlook, I did
find a way; I made a sub-folder in "Contacts" called "Snail Mail", ran an
advanced search on all contacts that contained nothing in the email address
field, and moved all of the contacts to the new folder. I haven't heard if
this is what he wants yet though. Thanks for the input.
> Expected behavior. A DL can only contain electronic addresses. Why would you
> put anything else in a DL?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> > this is not the solution that is desired. Every time we go to make a dis.
> > list it only shows those with an email address. Any ideas?
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 04 Jan 2006 17:15 GMT
Well a DL is definitely the wrong "container."
Categories or separate Contact subfolders are the only ways to group
contacts.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> That's what I told him, but he wanted a way to have all addresses without
> an
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>> > dis.
>> > list it only shows those with an email address. Any ideas?