Nor have you provided any clue. You must provide the precise steps you used
if you expect anyone to be able to help.
As a general rule, if you want to be sure you include an Outlook filed in
the merge, start the merge from Outlook.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
The mail merge function was started following the Wizard in both Word and
Publisher, following the Wizard steps and Mail Merge 101 on your website,
using Outlook Contacts as the source file for the merge.
The address block is presented as an editing option,or you can insert the
fields yourself. I tried both and the "Job title" field was added, however
upon merge no data was inserted in the field. {MERGEFIELD"JobTitle"\m}
Secondly, the instructions on your website for mail merge do not suggest
starting it from within Outlook, they say to do it within Word or Publisher,
which is exactly what I did. I did Publisher as a second option thinking it
might be a Word bug.
By the way, there is no reason to start your responses with a condescending
remark, since I was trying hard to search your website and find a fix, you
could have just asked me for more detail on which of your instructions I was
following.
It is extremely frustrating to surf all sorts of irrelevant information and
go in circles before finally finding somewhere where you can actually ask a
question. You could give people a little credit for not being a bunch of
totally computer illiterate bunch of fools.
I would certainly never speak to my customers that way.

Signature
A. Wyganowski
> Nor have you provided any clue. You must provide the precise steps you used
> if you expect anyone to be able to help.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> > to
> > why this might be happening.
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 01 Feb 2006 03:25 GMT
You misunderstand peer to peer newsgroups.
It is not my website, nor are you my customer.
It is "extremely frustrating" to have questions posed that contain no
relevant information that would permit an answer.
Do not confuse us with mind readers.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> The mail merge function was started following the Wizard in both Word and
> Publisher, following the Wizard steps and Mail Merge 101 on your website,
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>> > to
>> > why this might be happening.
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook] - 01 Feb 2006 05:08 GMT
Then I would try searching groups.google.com first to avoid appearing like
the ingrate you are.

Signature
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.
After furious head scratching, A. Wyganowski asked:
| The mail merge function was started following the Wizard in both Word
| and Publisher, following the Wizard steps and Mail Merge 101 on your
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
||| --
||| A. Wyganowski
Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] - 01 Feb 2006 14:39 GMT
Did you try what Russ suggested -- starting the merge from Outlook? That's the only way to ensure that all Outlook fields are available.

Signature
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
> The mail merge function was started following the Wizard in both Word and
> Publisher, following the Wizard steps and Mail Merge 101 on your website,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> > the
>> > fields are there EXCEPT the Job Title field where there is a blank line.