Yes - it selects the entire column.
> Sounds like you used Insert | Name | Create, which creates multiple ranges, not Insert | Name | Define, which creates just one. You need a single named range that covers all the data. To test, type that name into the box that appears just above the worksheet. Does it select all the data?
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> >> > all manually! Any ideas?
> >> > (orig. message 1-26)
The entire column? That doesn't sound right. Your named range needs to cover *all* the columns that you want to import. Try selecting all the data, then using Insert | Name | Define.

Signature
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
> Yes - it selects the entire column.
>
>> Sounds like you used Insert | Name | Create, which creates multiple ranges, not Insert | Name | Define, which creates just one. You need a single named range that covers all the data. To test, type that name into the box that appears just above the worksheet. Does it select all the data?
>> > Error message was just an error has occured - save all infor - outlook will
>> > restart. I did create a named range - named all columns at the name function
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>> >> > all manually! Any ideas?
>> >> > (orig. message 1-26)
Steelcity Gal - 02 Feb 2006 17:00 GMT
I didnt know to name *all* - Tried that - it worked- tried import of just
that name - the import worked however the contacts folder showed 154 items
and when I tried to open - all were blank. I then deleted items and tried an
import of all other "names". The first "area" showed the transfer in progress
and in contacts the item counter was advancing - it went up past 30000+ items
and then restarted the counter- when it reached 30000+ items (while still
showing a transfer from the first column named "area") I recieved an error
message - outlook encountered a problem - needs to close - sorry.
? - in excel - can there be any blank cells in the import range? I admit I
am new to Outlook - But it shouldnt be this difficult!
> The entire column? That doesn't sound right. Your named range needs to cover *all* the columns that you want to import. Try selecting all the data, then using Insert | Name | Define.
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> >> >> > all manually! Any ideas?
> >> >> > (orig. message 1-26)
Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] - 02 Feb 2006 17:14 GMT
Sounds like you might have skipped the step where you map the fields in the spreadsheet to the fields in Outlook that you want to hold the data.
The range should not have any blank rows, but can have blank cells in any column where you don't know the phone number, for example.

Signature
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
>I didnt know to name *all* - Tried that - it worked- tried import of just
> that name - the import worked however the contacts folder showed 154 items
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>> >> >> > all manually! Any ideas?
>> >> >> > (orig. message 1-26)
Steelcity Gal - 02 Feb 2006 18:46 GMT
Nope - completed that step - I did find out that you have to select the
specific data that you want imported - NOT the column which is what I was
selecting. I went back and named ~ column a - rows 1-155 ~ (not column a) and
then selected ~
a-h / 1-155 ~ and named that "members". When I imported to contacts I
mapped "members" and imported. IT WORKED!!!!
Sue, I want to thank both you and Vince for your patience and all the
expertise that both of you have given me. I have learned sooo much!
Thanks again!
> Sounds like you might have skipped the step where you map the fields in the spreadsheet to the fields in Outlook that you want to hold the data.
>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> >> >> >> > all manually! Any ideas?
> >> >> >> > (orig. message 1-26)