Good call. Easier for most folks. However, the only issue I see is the size
of the PST file. Typically, they get rather large over time for the average
user. Data transfer on a 10 Mbit connection (assuming a good wireless
signal?) for a 1 GB file? It's an overnight process.
-BB,
MCP, MCSE
> If you are using Outlook on both PC's, do not use Import and Export.
> Just copy the Outlook Data File (PST file) from one PC and open it in
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> >>
> >> wendy
Not quite sure how 1,000MB/10MBit/sec = overnight. I've used the same PST
file since Outlook 97, and it is a whopping 34MB.
The real point here is that exporting and importing is a deeply flawed
process in Outlook and should be avoided when simply moving data from one
installation of Outlook to another. If there are concerns over the size of
the PST file, then simply creating a new PST file and copying only the data
you need to transfer into it is far more reliable.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> Good call. Easier for most folks. However, the only issue I see is the
> size
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>> >>
>> >> wendy
Booger_Boy - 02 Feb 2006 22:22 GMT
I absolutely agree with you regarding the impaired functionality of the
import/export. But as far as managing file size, you and I are not the norm.
Most folks simply don't delete stuff. I bet you compact your PST regularly
also to streamline the database. I do.
My point is that to connect to a large file size over a typical home network
may prove to be more of a problem than anticipated. Nothing more.
-BB (Dave),
MCP, MCSE
> Not quite sure how 1,000MB/10MBit/sec = overnight. I've used the same PST
> file since Outlook 97, and it is a whopping 34MB.
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
> >> >>
> >> >> wendy