Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Outlook / Contacts / December 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Distribution Lists

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
tweeks - 15 Feb 2006 23:25 GMT
Hi,
I am a new user of Outlook 2000.  I have set up a distribution list but when
I tried to send an email, I get a System Administrator message that says No
transport provider was available for delivery to this recipient.  What does
that mean?

Thanks--
tweeks
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 16 Feb 2006 00:18 GMT
Most likely that you have a corrupt address in the DL.
Are all your other messages sent correctly?
Signature

Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]

> Hi,
> I am a new user of Outlook 2000.  I have set up a distribution list but
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Thanks--
> tweeks
tweeks - 16 Feb 2006 14:31 GMT
Yes, all my other messages are sent correctly.  What should I do to correct
this?  I noticed in a lot of the other discussions you suggest categories
instead of DL.  Where exactly to I specific the category?  I did not add the
email addresses to my contact list,  b/c I didn't have names associated with
them.  I just added the email addresses to the DL by clicking add new member.
I don't want these in my contact list.

Signature

tweeks

> Most likely that you have a corrupt address in the DL.
> Are all your other messages sent correctly?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> > Thanks--
> > tweeks
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 16 Feb 2006 22:00 GMT
DL's are notoriously unreliable, especially ones created in this way because
you will receive no warning if you enter an invalid address. You can examine
each entry and make sure the address is both valid and resolved.
Here is the way to use Categories in lieu of DL's:
http://www.outlook-tips.net/archives/2003/20030730.htm

Signature

Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]

> Yes, all my other messages are sent correctly.  What should I do to
> correct
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>> > Thanks--
>> > tweeks
eirehead - 16 May 2007 17:43 GMT
Hi, I get the this same error message for EVERY email I send (No transport
provider was available for delivery to this recipient.)
- and I am not using DLs. I have to resend every message, sometimes several
times, before it eventally gets sent. This is driving me bonkers!

> DL's are notoriously unreliable, especially ones created in this way because
> you will receive no warning if you enter an invalid address. You can examine
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> >> > Thanks--
> >> > tweeks
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 16 May 2007 23:00 GMT
Then you should probably share some relevant information if you want help.
There is none here. The minimum would include Outlook version, information
store, mail transport type, and recipient selection method.
Outlook is telling you it can't recognize the electronic address. Only you
could have a clue why that would occur. You can see your Contact data. We
can't.

Signature

Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]

> Hi, I get the this same error message for EVERY email I send (No transport
> provider was available for delivery to this recipient.)
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>> >> > Thanks--
>> >> > tweeks
eirehead - 16 May 2007 23:07 GMT
Sorry - Outlook 2003, POP3, recipient selection using all methods - reply,
Contacts, manually typed in, etc., with and without attachments - there is no
pattern at all. Thanks for your help.

> Then you should probably share some relevant information if you want help.
> There is none here. The minimum would include Outlook version, information
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
> >> >> > Thanks--
> >> >> > tweeks
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 17 May 2007 02:55 GMT
Indeed. No pattern at all.
Can't help without more information. Keep looking for one.
Are you saying Outlook never worked? If not, what steps did you use to break
it?
Are you saying that if you keep trying the same thing over and over that the
message is eventually sent?
That would be truly inexplicable.
Signature

Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]

> Sorry - Outlook 2003, POP3, recipient selection using all methods - reply,
> Contacts, manually typed in, etc., with and without attachments - there is
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
>> >> >> > Thanks--
>> >> >> > tweeks
eirehead - 17 May 2007 16:19 GMT
Yes, eventually the message is sent when I resend the message from the error
message - sometimes on the first try, sometimes 2 or 3 tries. I tried rolling
back to a few restore points, and it didn't help. I'm wondering if it might
be my internet connection... it used to work just fine, this started
happening about a week ago.

> Indeed. No pattern at all.
> Can't help without more information. Keep looking for one.
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
> >> >> >> > Thanks--
> >> >> >> > tweeks
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 17 May 2007 23:38 GMT
If your account setting were incorrect or the address was corrupt (the two
most likely causes for this error message), then the problem would be
persistent, not intermittent. Connectivity problems do not usually throw
this error message. When did you start getting these messages? Are you doing
anything else inadvisable, like scanning your outgoing messages for viruses?
Signature

Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]

> Yes, eventually the message is sent when I resend the message from the
> error
[quoted text clipped - 85 lines]
>> >> >> >> > Thanks--
>> >> >> >> > tweeks
eirehead - 17 May 2007 23:50 GMT
I think that was it! I opened my virus protection (I use McAfee) and drilled
down through the settings and sure enough, it was checking outgoing messages!
I turned it off (of course, it squawked that I wasn't protected), and
everything seems to be okay now! You are a genius, thanks so much!

> If your account setting were incorrect or the address was corrupt (the two
> most likely causes for this error message), then the problem would be
[quoted text clipped - 90 lines]
> >> >> >> >> > Thanks--
> >> >> >> >> > tweeks
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 18 May 2007 01:20 GMT
Scanning incoming and outgoing messages is never necessary, particularly
when you use an incompetent program like McAfee.
Signature

Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]

>I think that was it! I opened my virus protection (I use McAfee) and
>drilled
[quoted text clipped - 111 lines]
>> >> >> >> >> > Thanks--
>> >> >> >> >> > tweeks
srrunner - 19 Dec 2007 00:59 GMT
Thanks for the tips.  I'll give them a try.  The specific error message that
I received after setting up a Distribution List and attempting to test it
was:  "An unexpected error has occurred."
Signature

Senior Runner

> DL's are notoriously unreliable, especially ones created in this way because
> you will receive no warning if you enter an invalid address. You can examine
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> >> > Thanks--
> >> > tweeks
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.