Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Outlook / Contacts / March 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

pst files in Outlook 2003

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jackie D - 28 Mar 2006 19:19 GMT
Hi

Just a quick question: does anyone know why my Outlook personal folders says
Personal Folders (97-2000) when I right click, select properties, advanced?

When I do the same on my archive folders it just says Personal Folders. Is
there a difference?
Signature


Many thanks
JD

Vince Averello [MVP-Outlook] - 28 Mar 2006 20:13 GMT
The 97-2002 format only allowed a PST to grow to 2GB while the new format
(shown as simply "Personal Folders") allows the file to grow much larger.

> Hi
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> When I do the same on my archive folders it just says Personal Folders. Is
> there a difference?
Jackie D - 29 Mar 2006 00:45 GMT
Right. Is it odd then that Office 2003 would have the older version of the
personal folders? Is it possible to change it to the newer one?
Signature


Many thanks
JD

> The 97-2002 format only allowed a PST to grow to 2GB while the new format
> (shown as simply "Personal Folders") allows the file to grow much larger.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> > When I do the same on my archive folders it just says Personal Folders. Is
> > there a difference?
Vince Averello [MVP-Outlook] - 29 Mar 2006 10:34 GMT
It's not that odd, especially if you've upgraded versions on the same
machine. What I did was create a new PST in the new format, drag/dropped my
info to it then renamed the old one and made the new one use the old name.
Seemed to work OK for me (your mileage may vary).

> Right. Is it odd then that Office 2003 would have the older version of the
> personal folders? Is it possible to change it to the newer one?
Brian Tillman - 29 Mar 2006 20:08 GMT
> It's not that odd, especially if you've upgraded versions on the same
> machine. What I did was create a new PST in the new format,
> drag/dropped my info to it then renamed the old one and made the new
> one use the old name. Seemed to work OK for me (your mileage may
> vary).

Isn't that a good way to risk corrupting your mail profile?
Signature

Brian Tillman

Vince Averello [MVP-Outlook] - 29 Mar 2006 20:33 GMT
Hence the.... "your mileage may vary".

> Isn't that a good way to risk corrupting your mail profile?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.