Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Outlook / Contacts / April 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

not seeing all contacts

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Amie - 03 Apr 2006 16:32 GMT
There is a user in our company that cannot see all the contacts in his
contacts folder in Outlook XP.  If he goes to the address book and looks for
the contact there under contacts, he will find the contact.  

I am able to open his contacts folder from the Exchange 2000 server and can
see the contact he is not able to see.

He is viewing the contacts as Address Cards.

Does anyone have any ideas on why he wouldn't be able to see all of his
contacts when just going into his contacts folder?

Thanks
Brian Tillman - 03 Apr 2006 19:29 GMT
> There is a user in our company that cannot see all the contacts in his
> contacts folder in Outlook XP.  If he goes to the address book and
> looks for the contact there under contacts, he will find the contact.
>
> I am able to open his contacts folder from the Exchange 2000 server
> and can see the contact he is not able to see.

Does it make a difference when Cached Exchange mode is the opposite of that
it is now?
Signature

Brian Tillman

Amie - 03 Apr 2006 19:39 GMT
The user is using Outlook XP so there is no cached exchange mode... but I am
guessing it is like offline folders.  The user stated that he was not working
offline, but I do believe he has set up his outlook to work offline at times.
Now that I think about it, I will have to double check with him about this.

> > There is a user in our company that cannot see all the contacts in his
> > contacts folder in Outlook XP.  If he goes to the address book and
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Does it make a difference when Cached Exchange mode is the opposite of that
> it is now?
Amie - 04 Apr 2006 14:13 GMT
It turns out the user is working online.  So he is attached to the exchange
server.  What else could cause this?

Thanks.
Amie

> > There is a user in our company that cannot see all the contacts in his
> > contacts folder in Outlook XP.  If he goes to the address book and
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Does it make a difference when Cached Exchange mode is the opposite of that
> it is now?
Brian Tillman - 04 Apr 2006 19:44 GMT
> It turns out the user is working online.  So he is attached to the
> exchange server.  What else could cause this?

If he switches to another view, like a list view, does the missing data
show?
Signature

Brian Tillman

Amie - 10 Apr 2006 20:05 GMT
List view does not show the missing data.  I also had him check for any
filtering and he is not filtering anything in contacts.

> > It turns out the user is working online.  So he is attached to the
> > exchange server.  What else could cause this?
>
> If he switches to another view, like a list view, does the missing data
> show?
Brian Tillman - 11 Apr 2006 14:22 GMT
> List view does not show the missing data.  I also had him check for
> any filtering and he is not filtering anything in contacts.

I can't devise any conditions in my mind that would produce this behavior.
Perhaps someone else will be able to do so.
Signature

Brian Tillman

Amie - 11 Apr 2006 14:31 GMT
Thank you for your input.

> > List view does not show the missing data.  I also had him check for
> > any filtering and he is not filtering anything in contacts.
>
> I can't devise any conditions in my mind that would produce this behavior.
> Perhaps someone else will be able to do so.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.