You actually aren't even using Outlook's address book in IMO. You are using
the Windows Address Book of Outlook Express.
IMO went away years ago. So did this "problem."

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> Using Outlook 2000 SP-3 w/ latest updates in IMO mode.
>
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>
> IB
It's true that one is using the Windows Address Book with Outlook 2000
in IMO mode.
I am perfectly aware that the two different modes for Outlook ceased to
exist beginning with version 2002. You do not need to trivialize the
issue that I am experiencing, though, by writing "problem" (i.e. in
quotation marks) - it is obviously a real PROBLEM, which is why I wrote
about it in the first place.
If you say that the problem went away in newer versions of Outlook, I
wonder what happens there under the scenario that I described?
I do not understand the tone in your reply, because my post was
factual. I am asking for constructive help.
IB
> You actually aren't even using Outlook's address book in IMO. You are using
> the Windows Address Book of Outlook Express.
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> >
> > IB
Ben M. Schorr - MVP - 04 Jun 2006 02:22 GMT
Aloha Ivan,
I'm not sure exactly what you're looking for here. The situation you're
experiencing has already been fixed in later versions of the product; Microsoft,
understandably, isn't going to spend money and resources to change something
like that in a version of the product that is about to be 4 generations old.
I think you would get different behavior if you stopped using the Windows
Addresss Book (WAB) and instead used the Contacts folder in Outlook to store
your addresses, but I don't have any Outlook 2000 (and certainly no IMO)
machines around I can test that on.
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr - MVP
http://www.rolandschorr.com
Microsoft OneNote FAQ: http://www.factplace.com/onenotefaq.htm
> It's true that one is using the Windows Address Book with Outlook 2000
> in IMO mode.
[quoted text clipped - 75 lines]
>>>
>>> IB
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 04 Jun 2006 03:22 GMT
Fine. Here's constructive help. Outlook 2000 has been out of support for
many years. Do not expect any fixes. Switch to the full version of Outlook
2000 or switch to a supported version if you do not want this behavior.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
It's true that one is using the Windows Address Book with Outlook 2000
in IMO mode.
I am perfectly aware that the two different modes for Outlook ceased to
exist beginning with version 2002. You do not need to trivialize the
issue that I am experiencing, though, by writing "problem" (i.e. in
quotation marks) - it is obviously a real PROBLEM, which is why I wrote
about it in the first place.
If you say that the problem went away in newer versions of Outlook, I
wonder what happens there under the scenario that I described?
I do not understand the tone in your reply, because my post was
factual. I am asking for constructive help.
IB
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] wrote:
> You actually aren't even using Outlook's address book in IMO. You are
> using
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
> >
> > IB