> Hmm, finally Ended Task (after 30-40 minutes). re-opened Outlook & found
> 22,458 new empty records. I believe we will delete them, close Outlook
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> Is there a limit on number of records we can import into Outlook
>> Contacts?
Thanks, Karl.
I am guessing you are speaking of naming the whole data set as "Contacts",
as I had seen in the web page "In Microsoft Outlook, how can I import address
information from an Excel workbook into my Contacts list?" at Indiana
University, page
http://www.microsoft.com/wn3/aspx/postui.aspx?mid=75c19e01-c9f7-4cab-b471-a7d82e
561038&cat=&lang=&cr=&guid=&sloc=en-us&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.contacts&base
=http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx&bclr=ececec&fclr=0
00000&sxml=http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/site.xml&stgxml=http:
//www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/settings.xml&sdgloc=en-US
I have also read another post that tells me to Range Name each field-column
by iits field name, but that is the scheme which had resulted in my mass
mess of blank (or nearly blank) records, many of which had only one active
field per record!
Will try Range Name "Contacts", and go again.
Thanks!
-GeneM

Signature
Knowledge Spunge (need spill-checker)
> Most likely cause of extra records is that the "Named Range" in the Excel
> worksheet is not set correctly. Make sure it only encompasses the data you
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> > Hmm, finally Ended Task (after 30-40 minutes). re-opened Outlook & found
> > 22,458 new empty records.
GeneM office - 03 Aug 2006 17:58 GMT
Yep, one Range Name "Contacts", that's the ticket!
Worked like a charm!
Thanks, again, Karl!

Signature
Knowledge Spunge (need spill-checker)
> Thanks, Karl.
>
> I am guessing you are speaking of naming the whole data set as "Contacts",
> as I had seen in the web page "In Microsoft Outlook, how can I import address
> information from an Excel workbook into my Contacts list?" at Indiana
> University, page