> Microsoft Outlook 2000 is running on my desk top and has this feature. I
> don't know what else to tell you, but I really miss this feature when
> using
> my laptop, which runs 2003. There is another feature I miss, but should
> probably post it separately.
I go to the name in the address book and double click on it. The tabs that
come up are: Summary, Name, Home, Business, Personal, Other, NetMeeting,
Digital ID. I go to Other where the top dialog box has Notes and the box at
the bottom is titled "Group Membership." There it lists any groups of which
this individual is a member.
I also liked the way the old program allowed you to look at the address book
by last or first name. The new program only allows by first name and believe
me there are a lot of the Susans and not a lot of Czerwonkas. Also, I may
have to look through all of the known first names of members of a family to
find which name their subscription is under where it would be easier if I
could look under the last name.

Signature
Kathleen
> Where are you seeing it? I'm curious
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> > my laptop, which runs 2003. There is another feature I miss, but should
> > probably post it separately.
Brian Tillman - 18 Sep 2006 19:23 GMT
> I go to the name in the address book and double click on it. The
> tabs that come up are: Summary, Name, Home, Business, Personal,
> Other, NetMeeting, Digital ID. I go to Other where the top dialog box
> has Notes and the box at the bottom is titled "Group Membership."
> There it lists any groups of which this individual is a member.
This is because Outlook 2000 in Internet Mail Only mode actually used the
Windows Address Book, which has that feature. The Outlook Address Book
doesn't have that feature and Outlook 2002/2003 do not use the Windows
Address Book.

Signature
Brian Tillman
Vince Averello [MVP-Outlook] - 18 Sep 2006 19:25 GMT
I think that's the Personal Address Book. You can sort the Outlook Address
Book by either First name or File As.
>I go to the name in the address book and double click on it. The tabs that
> come up are: Summary, Name, Home, Business, Personal, Other, NetMeeting,
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> find which name their subscription is under where it would be easier if I
> could look under the last name.
Kathleen - 18 Sep 2006 19:44 GMT
OK. I recommend that a patch be provided which would allow the new Outlook
programs to access the address book. (What is confusing to me is that I have
always used the address book in Outlook and no where else, so it is odd that
it would it be located in different software.)

Signature
Kathleen
> I think that's the Personal Address Book. You can sort the Outlook Address
> Book by either First name or File As.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> > find which name their subscription is under where it would be easier if I
> > could look under the last name.
Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] - 18 Sep 2006 20:30 GMT
It's more complicated than that. The WAB uses a completely different "group" mechanism from Outlook distribution lists.

Signature
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
> OK. I recommend that a patch be provided which would allow the new Outlook
> programs to access the address book. (What is confusing to me is that I have
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>> > find which name their subscription is under where it would be easier if I
>> > could look under the last name.
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 18 Sep 2006 21:36 GMT
That's because you were never actually using Outlook. Your version was a
temporary incomplete version of Outlook that actually used Outlook Express
not Outlook for most of its functions including the address book.
Membership in a DL is not a Contact property, so that information cannot be
displayed in the Contact record.
Perhaps you could use Outlook Express instead since it seems to fit your
needs better. Lots of people find OE meets their needs better than Outlook.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> OK. I recommend that a patch be provided which would allow the new
> Outlook
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>> > I
>> > could look under the last name.