Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Outlook / Contacts / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Outlook should let me see distribution membership on contact info

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Kathleen - 18 Sep 2006 15:24 GMT
Outlook 2003 does not allow the user to check if a contact is part of a
distribution list without going to the actual group.  This feature was part
of older Outlook programs and is sorely missed by me, as I handle school and
community e-mail services with over 2,500 contacts.
Signature

Kathleen

Vince Averello [MVP-Outlook] - 18 Sep 2006 15:58 GMT
I don't seem to remember that being part of any release of Outlook unless it
was possibly a feature of the Personal Address Book.

> Outlook 2003 does not allow the user to check if a contact is part of a
> distribution list without going to the actual group.  This feature was
> part
> of older Outlook programs and is sorely missed by me, as I handle school
> and
> community e-mail services with over 2,500 contacts.
Kathleen - 18 Sep 2006 16:18 GMT
Microsoft Outlook 2000 is running on my desk top and has this feature.  I
don't know what else to tell you, but I really miss this feature when using
my laptop, which runs 2003.  There is another feature I miss, but should
probably post it separately.
Signature

Kathleen

> I don't seem to remember that being part of any release of Outlook unless it
> was possibly a feature of the Personal Address Book.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> > and
> > community e-mail services with over 2,500 contacts.
Vince Averello [MVP-Outlook] - 18 Sep 2006 16:41 GMT
Where are you seeing it? I'm curious

> Microsoft Outlook 2000 is running on my desk top and has this feature.  I
> don't know what else to tell you, but I really miss this feature when
> using
> my laptop, which runs 2003.  There is another feature I miss, but should
> probably post it separately.
Kathleen - 18 Sep 2006 17:09 GMT
I go to the name in the address book and double click on it.  The tabs that
come up are:  Summary, Name, Home, Business, Personal, Other, NetMeeting,
Digital ID. I go to Other where the top dialog box has Notes and the box at
the bottom is titled "Group Membership."  There it lists any groups of which
this individual is a member.    

I also liked the way the old program allowed you to look at the address book
by last or first name.  The new program only allows by first name and believe
me there are a lot of the Susans and not a lot of Czerwonkas.  Also, I may
have to look through all of the known first names of members of a family to
find which name their subscription is under where it would be easier if I
could look under the last name.
Signature

Kathleen

> Where are you seeing it? I'm curious
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> > my laptop, which runs 2003.  There is another feature I miss, but should
> > probably post it separately.
Brian Tillman - 18 Sep 2006 19:23 GMT
> I go to the name in the address book and double click on it.  The
> tabs that come up are:  Summary, Name, Home, Business, Personal,
> Other, NetMeeting, Digital ID. I go to Other where the top dialog box
> has Notes and the box at the bottom is titled "Group Membership."
> There it lists any groups of which this individual is a member.

This is because Outlook 2000 in Internet Mail Only mode actually used the
Windows Address Book, which has that feature.  The Outlook Address Book
doesn't have that feature and Outlook 2002/2003 do not use the Windows
Address Book.
Signature

Brian Tillman

Vince Averello [MVP-Outlook] - 18 Sep 2006 19:25 GMT
I think that's the Personal Address Book. You can sort the Outlook Address
Book by either First name or File As.

>I go to the name in the address book and double click on it.  The tabs that
> come up are:  Summary, Name, Home, Business, Personal, Other, NetMeeting,
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> find which name their subscription is under where it would be easier if I
> could look under the last name.
Kathleen - 18 Sep 2006 19:44 GMT
OK.  I recommend that a patch be provided which would allow the new Outlook
programs to access the address book.  (What is confusing to me is that I have
always used the address book in Outlook and no where else, so it is odd that
it would it be located in different software.)
Signature

Kathleen

> I think that's the Personal Address Book. You can sort the Outlook Address
> Book by either First name or File As.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> > find which name their subscription is under where it would be easier if I
> > could look under the last name.
Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] - 18 Sep 2006 20:30 GMT
It's more complicated than that. The WAB uses a completely different "group" mechanism from Outlook distribution lists.

Signature

Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
  Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
    http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
  and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
    Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
    http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
 

> OK.  I recommend that a patch be provided which would allow the new Outlook
> programs to access the address book.  (What is confusing to me is that I have
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>> > find which name their subscription is under where it would be easier if I
>> > could look under the last name.
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 18 Sep 2006 21:36 GMT
That's because you were never actually using Outlook. Your version was a
temporary incomplete version of Outlook that actually used Outlook Express
not Outlook for most of its functions including the address book.
Membership in a DL is not a Contact property, so that information cannot be
displayed in the Contact record.
Perhaps you could use Outlook Express instead since it seems to fit your
needs better. Lots of people find OE meets their needs better than Outlook.
Signature

Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]

> OK.  I recommend that a patch be provided which would allow the new
> Outlook
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>> > I
>> > could look under the last name.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.