> First of all, distribution lists have limited usefulness. They make sense only for very small, static distributions.
> Second, the better solution would have been to create a public folder, not another mailbox. All the hosted Exchange services that I know can handle that.
> Third, the procedure for adding another user's Contacts folder to a profile's address book is complicated because of the architecture of the Outlook Address Book service. And that procedure won't work at all in Outlook 2007.
> I don't understand this-- why do distribution lists have limited
> usefullness?
The amount of effort involved in maintaining a distribution list of even moderate size can be considerable (and tedious).
> What besides a distribution list would I use to send email
> to specific groups of people?
a) Mail merge
b) Select contacts, choose Actions | New Message to Contact
>> Second, the better solution would have been to create a public folder, not another mailbox. All the hosted Exchange services that I know can handle that.
>
> I can look into this. As long as the distribution lists in the public
> folders can be used in the address book _and_ the distribution lists
> can have permissions set on them then I assume this solution will work
> fine.
Only distribution lists in Active Directory (i.e. what you see in the Global Address List) can have permissions set on them. Folders get folder-level permissions, not item-level permissions.
> I had called them and asked the best
> way to share distribution lists amonst our engineers and this
> "functional mailbox" solution was the one I was told is the best way.
They must not know much about how users actually use DLs.

Signature
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
mcbill20@yahoo.com - 02 Nov 2006 02:05 GMT
> > I don't understand this-- why do distribution lists have limited
> > usefullness?
>
> The amount of effort involved in maintaining a distribution list of even moderate size can be considerable (and tedious).
This is my whole point. If each user has to maintain their own
distribution lists, they will mostly be out of sync. It's not that big
a deal for myself or another network admin to add new employees or
remove them when they leave. It only amounts to a couple of additions
and deletions per month. And if the lists are shared, it only has to be
done once and all the users automatically have the correct lists.
> > What besides a distribution list would I use to send email
> > to specific groups of people?
>
> a) Mail merge
> b) Select contacts, choose Actions | New Message to Contact
Unless I am not seeing something here, you apparently do not understand
how things are done at businesses in the real world. If I tell our
users that each time they need to send an email to a particular group,
they will need to go into contacts and select each person in the list
or they need to maintain their own lists I can assure you that I will
soon be out of a job.
As for mail merge, well, where is the list supposed to come from and
who maintains it?
> >> Second, the better solution would have been to create a public folder, not another mailbox. All the hosted Exchange services that I know can handle that.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> They must not know much about how users actually use DLs.
This I agree with.
Bill
Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] - 02 Nov 2006 04:14 GMT
> It's not that big
> a deal for myself or another network admin to add new employees or
> remove them when they leave.
Do you mean that you're creating a separate folder of contacts that duplicate the employee list that is already in the GAL? That sounds like a lot of duplication. DLs of employees should be maintained in the GAL where the original data is. If your host provider can't handle that, I bet there are others who can.
> If I tell our
> users that each time they need to send an email to a particular group,
> they will need to go into contacts and select each person in the list
> or they need to maintain their own lists I can assure you that I will
> soon be out of a job.
I suggested neither. Categories make it easy to select an entire group of people from a shared contacts folder.
> As for mail merge, well, where is the list supposed to come from and
> who maintains it?
Same place as it is now - a shared contacts folder, or better yet, a public contacts folder, which doesn't have the same limitation related to the address book.

Signature
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx