There is no separate address book in Outlook and hasn't been for years. The
address book is simply a view of your Contacts Folders. You cannot store
Contacts anywhere but in Contacts Folders.
The Outlook Address Book does not display every Contact. It only displays
those with electronic addresses.
If you want to see only the primary email address in the Outlook Address
Book, store the other electronic addresses in other fields so they will not
display.
Most users have migrated away from using the Outlook Address Book for
recipient selection because it is too inconvenient and cannot be customized.
Contacts Folders on the other hand are highly customizable. Most users now
use autocompletion for quick recipient selection.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
>I keep a lot of information stored in my Contacts folder. However, there's
>a fairly small group of people I e-mail regularly. In previous version of
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Karl
Thanks for your reply, Russ. Just not what I was hoping to hear. :-/
---RE: "There is no separate address book in Outlook"
I used Outlook 2003 (and previous versions) until recently and I had the
option of using a different (PAB or WAB) address book as a first choice when
I addressed e-mails. This is no longer an option in 2007.
---RE:"If you want to see only the primary email address in the Outlook
Address Book, store the other electronic addresses in other fields so they
will not display."
That kind of of defeats the purpose of storing them in the designated fields
to start with, don't you think? If I move all the FAX numbers out of the
FAX fields, they won't show up in the Contacts views I WANT to see them in.
Just doesn't seem too practical.
---RE: "Most users now use autocompletion for quick recipient selection."
That works great if you know in advace everyone you want to send to. Using
the old method, I used to be able to pick from a short list (as a memory
jog) of intened recipients.
It's usually not the same people each time, or a distribution list would
easily fill the bill.
---RE: "Contacts Folders on the other hand are highly customizable."
(Except that you can't specify which entries appear in the e-mail TO: list)
;-)
I realize that as a home Outlook user, I may be in a minority. The Contacts
and WAB address options work "ok" for me on our corporate servers at work
(like I have a choice). My workflow at home is quite a bit different. Guess
I'll just have to learn to adapt.
Happy Holidays,
Karl
> There is no separate address book in Outlook and hasn't been for years.
> The address book is simply a view of your Contacts Folders. You cannot
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>>
>> Karl
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 10 Dec 2006 19:47 GMT
I understand. Microsoft seems determined to steer us away from that address
book interface. It's not that bad when you get used to it. Between
autocompletion and the use of Categories and separate Contact subfolders,
recipient selection can be customized to suit your needs.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> Thanks for your reply, Russ. Just not what I was hoping to hear. :-/
>
[quoted text clipped - 69 lines]
>>>
>>> Karl