
Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
Russ
Cost?
Hassle to implement?
Support?
> Is there a reason you don't want to use Exchange Server? The only reason
> Outlook exists is to be the client for Exchange Server. Anything else
> Outlook might try to do is a poorly implemented afterthought.
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 29 Aug 2007 03:35 GMT
Understood. So what is your question?

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> Russ
> Cost?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> Outlook exists is to be the client for Exchange Server. Anything else
>> Outlook might try to do is a poorly implemented afterthought.
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 29 Aug 2007 10:51 GMT
Perhaps you are asking for a way to share Outlook data without using
Exchange. I know of no good ones. If all you want to share is Contact data,
on this site is an article on various ways to share Outlook data:
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/assistance/HA011477571033.aspx
You will also find a list of third-party sharing tools:
http://www.mapistore.com/Outlook/Groupware
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/share.htm

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> Russ
> Cost?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> Outlook exists is to be the client for Exchange Server. Anything else
>> Outlook might try to do is a poorly implemented afterthought.