In Outlook, for any contacts that have no email address, the address book in
the mail program is giving a false email. It usually consists of the persons
name the @ symbol and the beginning of their phone number. how do I change
this to show no email address?

Signature
kaj
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 19 Mar 2008 00:59 GMT
The address book view in Outlook only displays electronic addresses. There
is no reason for it to display anything else, so, in fact, it does not.
Accordingly, what you are claiming is not possible. Convince us of the
accuracy of your claim.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> In Outlook, for any contacts that have no email address, the address book
> in
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> change
> this to show no email address?
Brian Tillman - 19 Mar 2008 13:23 GMT
> In Outlook, for any contacts that have no email address, the address
> book in the mail program is giving a false email. It usually
> consists of the persons name the @ symbol and the beginning of their
> phone number. how do I change this to show no email address?
It's showing you the fax addresses of the contacts, which is appropriate,
since the fax address is an electronic address.

Signature
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 19 Mar 2008 21:04 GMT
But that would show the entire phone number, not just the beginning. I think
we need a more accurate description from the OP.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
>
>> In Outlook, for any contacts that have no email address, the address
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> It's showing you the fax addresses of the contacts, which is appropriate,
> since the fax address is an electronic address.
Brian Tillman - 20 Mar 2008 13:34 GMT
> But that would show the entire phone number, not just the beginning.
I suspect that he doesn't have the window or the specific field wide enough
to see the entire value.

Signature
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 20 Mar 2008 23:14 GMT
We'll never know.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
>
>> But that would show the entire phone number, not just the beginning.
>
> I suspect that he doesn't have the window or the specific field wide
> enough to see the entire value.