You received bad advice. Using an old format PST in Outlook 2003 will not
slow anything down.
Overwriting a PST the way you did can corrupt it or its settings (that's why
you had to reconnect your Outlook Address Book).
Then renaming that PST instead of disconnecting it from your Outlook profile
correctly will even more likely corrupt it.
What you should have done and can still do is simply configure Outlook to
use your old PST in the correct way: Create a new Outlook Profile from
scratch and set it to use your old PST as its information store.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> Russ
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> 2. I copied the complete outlook.pst from the 2000 machine to the 2003 computer and installed it in the correct subdirectory.
> 3. Opened the 2003 using the old 2000 file and everything worked - except
no address book.
> 4. followed your directions to connect the Contacts to the Address Book and it worked fine.
>
> Everything worked OK at this point!!
> BUT.
>
> 5. After talking to Woody Leonhard of Woody's Office Power Pack (WOPR)
and writer of books on MS Office he said that my slowness of the new Outlook
was due to using the old outlook.pst file. That the new file system was
more efficient . I followed his directions as follows.
> 6. Renamed outlook.pst file to outlook1.pst (this was the file after the transfer from Outlook 2000. Opened Outlook 2003 and let it created a new
pst file.
> 7. I then opened the outlook1.pst file and copied all of the folders and email from outlook1.pst to the newly created outlook.pst file. This was
easy but time consuming. It did work much more efficiently. There was no
"Contacts" folder shown to transfer.
> 8. I discovered that I had lost all my rules - so I did them again
(cleaned things out!!!).
> 9. I discovered I lost my Contacts folder. I searched high and low for it, tried to make a connect with the Contacts file and the Address Book as
per your instructions - but nothing in Contacts. I can not find any file
with the Contacts in them in the new computer.
> 10. I still have three Address Books/Contacts in the old computer with Outlook 2000 and need to transfer these over to the new computer and Outlook
2003 (they are networked together).
> Hopefully this will help you understand where I am and can tell me what I need to do to make the transfer. Thanks for all you do on this list.
>
> Since I have been receiving email in the new computer and Outlook 2003, I
cannot go through the process again without losing email - which for many
reasons I can not do.
> Don Cooley
> Phone: 408-268-6400
> Email: cooleydd@pacbell.net
> Prostate-Help Gateway: http://www.prostate-help.net
cooleydd - 08 Dec 2003 18:21 GMT
Rus
I would beg to differ with you as when I did transfer the folders and files over to Outook 2003 there was an appreciable pickup in speed. when you consider my ost file is 1GB it was readily noticeable. There is little doubt in my mind that I did the right thing along that line
As far as the lost Contacts - I guess I hae to live with it - granted I may have caused it but there appears to be no way to transfer Contacts only from Outlook 2000 ot Outlook 2003 from what you say. I cannot go back and use the old outlook.pst file as I would loose a number of emails that I cannot lose for various reasons
Thanks for your time and help even though apparently the problem is insolvable with the limitations I have. I will just recreate the address book
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 08 Dec 2003 18:41 GMT
I agree. With a PST over 1G you might notice an increase in speed. That's an
unusual circumstance for most standalone users.
The bad advice was on the method Woody gave you. Simply renaming the default
PST is not supported. To switch default stores, open or create your new
store within Outlook, configure the new PST to be the default, then close
the old. To transfer information from an older format PST, simply open it in
Outlook 2003 and use the Copy to Folder... command to transfer data. It
seems to me you can still do that.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> Russ
>
> I would beg to differ with you as when I did transfer the folders and files over to Outook 2003 there was an appreciable pickup in speed. when
you consider my ost file is 1GB it was readily noticeable. There is little
doubt in my mind that I did the right thing along that line.
> As far as the lost Contacts - I guess I hae to live with it - granted I may have caused it but there appears to be no way to transfer Contacts only
from Outlook 2000 ot Outlook 2003 from what you say. I cannot go back and
use the old outlook.pst file as I would loose a number of emails that I
cannot lose for various reasons.
> Thanks for your time and help even though apparently the problem is insolvable with the limitations I have. I will just recreate the address
book.