 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWordDirectoryUser Groups Related Topics Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ... |
MS Office Forum / Outlook / Contacts / February 2004outlook 2000 shared contacts
on a workgroup (no exchange) shared contacts and net folders work fine, a new PC has been added to the group, with outlook 2003 and it doesn't seem to have the same features, a quick browse for help gave me the impression its now only available with an exchange connection. So do i have to install outlook 2000 on this PC? an invite to join an existing shared contact list comes in but there is no choice to accept, and I changed the outlook install to have all options installed. can anyone verify this or better still tell me I'm wrong, and give me directions on how to correct the issue/ TIA Aart Net Folders has not been supported since Outlook 2000. It was never reliable even then.  SignatureRuss Valentine [MVP-Outlook] > on a workgroup (no exchange) shared contacts and net folders work fine, a > new PC has been added to the group, with outlook 2003 and it doesn't seem to [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > TIA > Aart Cool thats what i needed to know. Next question, what can they use instead? should i roll back the current 2003 outlook, or use a 3rd party app.that supports outlook 98/2000/xp & 2003 They have a win2k server with AD but are just receiving emails via pop. they have trend AV installed and just want to have a common address book that anyone can update dynamically for all. TIA Aart > Net Folders has not been supported since Outlook 2000. It was never reliable > even then. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > TIA > > Aart No good options without Exchange server. For information on ways to share Contacts or Calendar items with Outlook, take a look here: http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/share.htm http://www.slipstick.com/addins/groupcontacts.htm SignatureRuss Valentine [MVP-Outlook] > Cool thats what i needed to know. > Next question, what can they use instead? should i roll back the current [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > > TIA > > > Aart |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.