Not a change. The Outlook Address Book has always behaved this way.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> So a change from Outlook 2000. Because I sure have installs doing it
> the "right" way.
>
>>I agree with you. Unfortunately Microsoft hasn't implemented that.
Maybe I should be more specific
Comparing IMO setups, both XP, but one OL2000 and one (recently
upgraded to) OL2003. Both are "show names" from Contacts. 2000
doesn't show Fax entries, but 2003 does. What am I missing?
Sorry to be so dense, but this is one of my few disappointments after
upgrading to 2003..... I don't fax
>Not a change. The Outlook Address Book has always behaved this way.
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] - 22 Oct 2004 17:11 GMT
I explained this in the reply to your other post. IMO does not use the
Outlook Address Book. It uses the Windows Address Book engine and your
Contacts Folder as the data source. There is no IMO mode in Outlook 2003, by
the way. Only in Outlook 98 and 2000.

Signature
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
> Maybe I should be more specific
> Comparing IMO setups, both XP, but one OL2000 and one (recently
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>>Not a change. The Outlook Address Book has always behaved this way.