Did he say what ordering mechanism he found? Exchange likes to be first and
while it will work for at least a while, it's easily broken and Exchange
will take over sending, even if second.
I'm curious, why does the tech want to eliminate Exchange email?

Signature
Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
Author, Teach Yourself Outlook 2003 in 24 Hours
Coauthor, OneNote 2003 for Windows (Visual QuickStart Guide)
Author, Google and Other Search Engines (Visual QuickStart Guide)
Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/
Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com
Join OneNote Tips mailing list: http://www.onenote-tips.net/
Vote for your favorite Outlook and Exchange utilities in the
Slipstick Ratings Raffle at http://www.slipstick.com/contest/
> Know a tech working on a job where the customer has Exchange 5.5 SP3
> running
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Thanks,
> -Jeff
Jeff Fink - 23 Jun 2004 23:50 GMT
> Did he say what ordering mechanism he found? Exchange likes to be first and
> while it will work for at least a while, it's easily broken and Exchange
> will take over sending, even if second.
Seems to me that given the SMTP protocol, it really wouldn't be Exchange
taking over, but rather Outlook deciding differently how to send email. I'm
not sure where he found the ordering but he specifically said it wasn't
under Tools -> Services. There was another list somewhere else. Afraid I
can't offer more as I don't use Outlook.
> I'm curious, why does the tech want to eliminate Exchange email?
It sounds like there is some email feature at the ISP that Exchange 5.5
doesn't have (and they're not wanting to pay for the upgrade).
-Jeff