Sue
Actually, you've given me just enough information to work some of the answer
out myself. I feel empowered now! ;-) So, instead of the questions
before, could you help me with these?...
I still think the field chooser makes it difficult to view each field if
many are added. Do you agree, Sue?
I understand the "read layout" design process now.
I understand how to designate the default "reply to folder" form now.
I have some fields in "User defined" and some in the form. However, I
thought that I created all fields in exactly the same way. Do you know how
I did this, and whether there is any advantage in using one rather than the
other in some situations?
Again, thank you very much, Sue - you're a star!
Paul
"Paul D" <post_to_group_not_me@this_interesting_group.com> wrote in message
news:ceulfl$8dn$1@news.freedom2surf.net...
> Thank you very much Sue - that's extremely useful!
>
> Is it OK to ask you a couple more questions, or shall I switch groups?
>
> I didn't know about using the Field Chooser to show the fields. This is
> interesting, but not practical in the long term, as no slide bar appears
in
> Outlook as fields are added. Hence, it's difficult to see all the fields
> when more than a few are added.
>
> Could you explain a bit more about creating a custom form to display the
> user-defined field information? Also, when this has been created, how is
it
> made the default view?
>
> Regarding the conversations, maybe I am jumping the gun. I'm glad that
you
> seem to be confirming that the default behaviour is the one I need!! ;-)
> However, how could I change the default "reply to folder" form for a
> specific folder if need be?
>
> Do you know if there are any tutorials on these subjects? I found it
> impossible to find what I was looking for using search engines.
>
> "Noted" about the forms newsgroup - I shall definitely use these in
future.
> :-)
>
> Thank you ever so much for your help - I was truely stuck before!
>
> Take care
> Paul
Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] - 06 Aug 2004 03:23 GMT
> I still think the field chooser makes it difficult to view each field if
> many are added. Do you agree, Sue?
See my response to your other post on this issue.
> I have some fields in "User defined" and some in the form. However, I
> thought that I created all fields in exactly the same way. Do you know how
> I did this, and whether there is any advantage in using one rather than the
> other in some situations?
See http://www.outlookcode.com/d/fields.htm for best practices on field
creation. There is a difference!

Signature
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of
Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
Paul D - 06 Aug 2004 08:52 GMT
After reading through this newsgroup, it seems as though I'm only one who's
thankful for your hard work and advice.
Thank you, Sue, for all your help - it's very much appreciated!
Best of luck
Paul