So I should design the form using the seperate read layout, then activate the
read layout and everything should copy over?
> > But when I copy that control and paste it on reply side of the form it
> > doesn't take the compose form sides input and copy it to the reply side. As
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Hollis Paul
> Mukilteo, WA USA
JohnG - 24 Sep 2006 00:14 GMT
Well nevermind for now, I got bigger problems. I just tested the datepicker
by "run this form" and I can pick a new date just fine but when I send it to
the set email address and open it up today's date shown, not the date picked
by the user.
So I need to chew this problem over first anyways.
> So I should design the form using the seperate read layout, then activate the
> read layout and everything should copy over?
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> > Hollis Paul
> > Mukilteo, WA USA
Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] - 24 Sep 2006 15:08 GMT
Did you bind the date/time control to an Outlook field?

Signature
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
> Well nevermind for now, I got bigger problems. I just tested the datepicker
> by "run this form" and I can pick a new date just fine but when I send it to
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>> > Hollis Paul
>> > Mukilteo, WA USA
JohnG - 28 Sep 2006 18:41 GMT
No I did no bindings at all, I thought the field itself was enough. I'm just
beginning to figure out the logical relationships in the forms and what seems
obvious isn't yet second nature to me. Thanks for the reminder.
> Did you bind the date/time control to an Outlook field?
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> >> > Hollis Paul
> >> > Mukilteo, WA USA
Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] - 28 Sep 2006 19:25 GMT
The key concept is that a control on the design surface is not the same thing as a property (i.e. field) in the underlying item.

Signature
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
> No I did no bindings at all, I thought the field itself was enough. I'm just
> beginning to figure out the logical relationships in the forms and what seems
> obvious isn't yet second nature to me. Thanks for the reminder.
>
>> Did you bind the date/time control to an Outlook field?
>> > Well nevermind for now, I got bigger problems. I just tested the datepicker
>> > by "run this form" and I can pick a new date just fine but when I send it to
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>> >> > Hollis Paul
>> >> > Mukilteo, WA USA
Hollis Paul [MVP - Outlook] - 24 Sep 2006 16:24 GMT
> So I should design the form using the seperate read layout, then activate the
> read layout and everything should copy over?
What on earth do you mean by "So I should design the form using the separate
read layout"? You get a blank form to design. When it opens you can edit
either the compose page or the read page. (This is a really stupid default
setup that Microsoft put into their product. People, who do not need a split
form--that is, who do not really want any differences between the read form and
the compose form--automatically create a compose form and ignore the read form,
and then wonder why nobody can see their form. The form should open as one
unsplit form!) The first thing you should do is drop down the Forms Menu and
uncheck the Separate Read Layout. Now you can compose all the common features
of your form. When that is done, you can click the Separate Read Layout menu
button, and all the controls you have already designed appear on both the
compose and the read layouts. Now you add the unique elements to the compose
and/or read layouts. When done you can publish and test the form.
What you have never questioned is whether you, in fact, need a split form. Do
you really have something on the compose form that you do not want to see on the
read form? Or, vice versus?
--
Hollis Paul
Mukilteo, WA USA
JohnG - 28 Sep 2006 18:38 GMT
Yes I made that mistake exactly Paul. When I created the form it was already
in a seperate read/compose layout. Until you said something I did assume I
had to create both sides myself, but now I understand I don't.
Although I do need a seperate read layout 98% of the form is the same as the
compose I will do as you have instructed thank you.
> > So I should design the form using the seperate read layout, then activate the
> > read layout and everything should copy over?
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> Hollis Paul
> Mukilteo, WA USA